Integration of computer technology in teacher education at Pakistan public sector university

Sadruddin Bahadur Qutoshi, Tajuddin Ddin Sharar, Sabit Rahim, Lourdes Bárbara Alpizar Caballero

Texto completo:

HTML PDF

Resumen

Introduction: Qualitative case study aims to explore the perceived practices of teacher educators about technology integration in their pedagogical engagement in B. Ed (Hons), elementary program offered by a public sector mountainous university in Pakistan. 
Objective: To explore the practices perceived by university teachers on the Integration of Computer Technology in Teacher Education to achieve the learning outcomes of the new four-year model B. Ed, to enable educators to improve their academic competence, and related professional competence, in the current, ongoing climate of educational reform. 
Methods: Qualitative case study research, theoretical and empirical methods were used; semi-structured and open Skype interviews were applied, based on an intentional sample of two teachers. Results: the teachers integrated computer technology in their teaching but the nature of integration was superficial. 
Conclusions: The new four-year model B. Ed used, was based in teacher-centered instead of learner-centered, the level of integration was symbolic. The institutional conditions in terms of resources, proficient level of knowledge and skills presented weaknesses, and improper organizational arrangements for technology integration in teaching. Authors recommended developing teachers' knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge of computer technology to improve 'essential conditions' required for successful integration of technology in teaching.

Palabras clave

teacher education; teacher educators; pedagogical approaches; computer technology; technology integration; mountainous university

Referencias

Almenara JC, Díaz VM. ICT training of university teachers in a Personal Learning Enviroment. Project DIPRO 2.0. Journal of new approaches in educational research. 2012 [access: 15/05/2019];1(1):36. Available from: https://rua.ua.es/dspace/bitstream/10045/60784/2/NAER_1_1_02_esp.pdf

Jamil M, Tariq R, Shami P, Zarakiys B. Computer-based vs paper-based examinations: Perceptions of university teachers. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. 2012 [access: 15/05/2019];11(4):371-381. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ989302.pdf

Suleman Q, Behan ZA, Fanoos A. Effectiveness of Multimedia in the Development of Teachers Training Institutes at Tertiary Level in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (Pakistan). International Journal of Learning and Development. 2012 [access: 20/05/2019];2(6):1-21. Available from: https://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ijld/article/view/2667/5903

Welliver P, Marcinkiewicz, H, Rieber L. Instructional transformation: A model for change. Paper presented at: Regional Computer Resource Center at Penn State to the other state centers and member teachers (US): PRCR University Park and C. a. TPS University. Pennsylvania, US; 1990.

Tondeur J, Forkosh-Baruch A, Prestridge S, Albion P, Edirisinghe S. Responding to challenges in teacher professional development for ICT integration in education. Educational Technology & Society. 2016 [access: 15/05/2019]; 19(3): 110-120. Available from: https://www.jstor.org/stable/jeductechsoci.19.3.110

Yin RK. Applications of case study research. Sage Publications Ltd. 3th ed. 2011 [access: 13/02/ 2019]. Available from: https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/cab/applications-of-case-study-research/book235140

World Health Organization. Social Determinants of Health. The solid facts. 2nd ed. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2003 [access: 13/02/2019]. Available from: https://www.euro.who.int/document/e81384.pdf

Aslan A, Chang Z. Pre-service teachers' perceptions of ICT integration in teacher education in Turkey. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. 2015 [access: 13/02/ 2019];14(3):11-16. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1067711.pdf

Weimer M. Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. Washington DC: Ed. John Wiley & Sons; 2002:456 p.

Selwyn N. The use of computer technology in university teaching and learning: a critical perspective. Journal of computer assisted learning. 2007 [access: 13/06/2019];23(2):83-94. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00204.x

Koehler MJ, Mishra P, Cain W. What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education. 2013 [access: 20/06/ 2019];193(3):13-19. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/002205741319300303

Qutoshi SB, Poudel T. Student Centered Approach to Teaching: What Does it Mean for the Stakeholders of a Community School in Karachi, Pakistan? Journal of Education and Research. 2014 [access: 13/04/ 2019]; 4(1): 24-38. Available from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/09df/9d52f9562f4029ef8291cb502530301d31ff.pdf

Pitler H, Hubbell ER, Kuhn M. Using technology with classroom instruction that works. 2nd Edition. North Carolina. ASCD: book copublished with McREL; 2012. [access: 13/02/ 2019]. Available from: https://www.ascd.org/publications/books/112012.aspx

Hassan A. Difference in Male and Female about the Awareness of Educational Technology at B. Ed Level. Pakistan Journal of Life and Social Sciences. 2010 [access: 13/02/2019]; 8(2): 89-93. Available from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3802/b6e1d0dd5cf2701d7287ea2d137f3cc37228.pdf

Lawless KA, Pellegrino JW. Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of educational research. 2007 [access: 15/06/ 2019];77(4): 575-614. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.3102/0034654307309921?journalCode=rera

Nawaz A, Qureshi QA. Eteaching/Epedagogy Threats & Opportunities for Teachers In Heis. Global Journal of Management And Business Research. 2010 [access: 12/06/2019];12(8):372-377. Available from: https://globaljournals.org/GJMBR_Volume12/E_Journal_GJMBR_Vol_12_Issue_8_May.pdf

Koehler MJ, Mishra P, Cain W. What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? Journal of Education. 2013 [access: 12/06/2019];193(3): 13-19. Available from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/5a8e/5ca4a0c82d915ddc822cadafaff4e25d87d5.pdf

Ifenthaler D. Computer-based learning. Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning, New York: Springer; 2012. p. 713-716.

Aydin MK, Gurol M, Vanderlinde R. Evaluating ICT integration in Turkish K-12 schools through teachers' views. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education. 2016 [access: 12/06/2019]; 12(4): 747-766. Available from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ989302.pdf

Rosenberg JM, Koehler MJ. Context and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A systematic review. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 2015 [access: 18/05/ 2019]; 47(3): 186-210. Available from: https://www.matt-koehler.com/publications/Rosenberg_Koehler_JRTE_2015.pdf

Barnett J, McPherson V, Sandieson RM. Connected teaching and learning: The uses and implications of connectivism in an online class. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 2013 [access: 18/05/ 2019]; 29(5):685-698. Available from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1ab0/790b292b7691c04ae2e49376c27bae81638f.pdf

Domínguez Pérez C, Organista Sandoval J, López Ornelas M. Diseño instruccional para el desarrollo de contenidos educativos digitales para teléfonos inteligentes. Apertura. 2018 [access: 15/05/2019];10(2):80-93. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.18381/Ap.v10n2.1346

Chiecher AC, Melgar MF. ¿Lo saben todo? Innovaciones educativas orientadas a promover competencias digitales en universitarios. Apertura. 2018 [access: 20/05/ 2019]; 10(2), 110-123. Available from: https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/apertura/v10n2/2007-1094-apertura-10-02-110.pdf

Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.


Bookmark and Share


URL de la licencia: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/