Efficacy and safety of autologous fat grafting for nasolabial fold depressions

Authors

Keywords:

adipose tissue; autologous; nasolabial fold; transplantation

Abstract

Introduction: Nasolabial fold depression is a hallmark of midface aging; autologous fat grafting is a volumizing option, yet more evidence on efficacy and safety is needed.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of autologous fat grafting for the treatment of nasolabial fold depression.

Methods: A prospective single-center clinical practice case series was conducted in 68 consecutive patients with nasolabial fold depression treated with autologous fat grafting. Patients were enrolled from 01/2023 to 06/2025 and followed at T0 (baseline), T1 (1 month), T3 (3 months), and T6 (6 months).

Results: Mean age was 39.1±6.9 years; 89.7% were women. WSRS improved significantly: the mean bilateral score decreased from 3.33 (T0) to 2.23 (T6) (p < 0.001). At T6, GAIS rated much/very much improved in 70.6%, and satisfaction scores of 4–5 were reported by 77.9%. Early events mainly included swelling/edema, bruising, pain. Late complications at T6 included nodules/induration or contour irregularities in 7.4%, asymmetry in 5.9%; oil cyst/fat necrosis persisted in 1.5% at T6. Additional interventions were required in 14.7% at T6.

Conclusions: Autologous fat grafting provided clinically meaningful improvement in nasolabial fold depression with high patient satisfaction. Adverse events were mostly mild, and late complications were uncommon; however, the need for secondary interventions increased over time.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Quan Y, Zhang T, Liu L, Han B, Cao Z, Shen Y. Quantitative Assessment of Nasolabial Fold Characteristics Across Age Groups [Internet]. Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum. 2025; 7:1-13. DOI: 10.1093/asjof/ojaf075

2. Hung WK, Chen CB, Cheng CY, Chang SL, Hu S, Chang YC, et al. The aging process of deep fat compartments in the midface and midfacial rejuvenation: An ultrasound-based analysis [Internet]. Dermatologica Sinica. 2023; 41(4):251-256. DOI: 10.4103/ds.DS-D-23-00179

3. Day DJ, Littler CM, Swift RW, Gottlieb S. The Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale [Internet]. American Journal of Clinical Dermatology. 2004; 5(1):49-52. DOI:10.2165/00128071-200405010-00007

4. Stefura T, Kacprzyk A, Droś J, Krzysztofik M, Skomarovska O, Fijałkowska M, et al. Tissue Fillers for the Nasolabial Fold Area: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials [Internet]. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2021; 45(5):2300-16. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-021-02439-5

5. Kim BR, Shin J-W, Kim D-W, Choung JJ, Jang Y, Lee S-H, et al. Efficacy and Safety of New Hyaluronic Acid Filler for Nasolabial Fold Correction: A Double-Blind, Randomized Trial [Internet]. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2026; 157(2):249-56. DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000012320

6. Janovskiene A, Chomicius D, Afanasjevas D, Petronis Z, Razukevicius D, Jagelaviciene E. Safety and Potential Complications of Facial Wrinkle Correction with Dermal Fillers: A Systematic Literature Review [Internet]. Medicina. 2025; 61(1):25. DOI: 10.3390/medicina61010025

7. Vasavada A, Raggio BS. Autologous fat grafting for facial rejuvenation. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing; 2023. [access: 21/01/2026]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557860/

8. Carruthers KH, Austen WG, Jr, Remy K, Hamaguchi R, Liu S, Vyas K, et al. Improving the Retention of Low-Volume Autologous Fat Grafting: A Comparative Analysis of Lipoaspirate Processing Techniques for Facial Feminization [Internet]. Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum. 2024; 6:1-8. DOI: 10.1093/asjof/ojae043

9. Schiraldi L, Sapino G, Meuli J, Maruccia M, Cherubino M, Raffoul W, et al. Facial Fat Grafting (FFG): Worth the Risk? A Systematic Review of Complications and Critical Appraisal [Internet]. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(16):4708. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11164708

10. Brown K, McCoskey M, Nakra T. Complications of facial autologous fat grafting [Internet]. Plastic and Aesthetic Research. 2024; 11(7):8-14. DOI: 10.20517/2347-9264.2023.94

11. Chaghamirzayi P, Abdi H, Rozveh JK, Nejad MA, Azizmanesh M. Fat embolism following fat grafting: A systematic review of reported cases. [Internet]. JPRAS Open. 2025; 43:18-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2024.10.012

12. Egro FM, Roy E, Rubin JP, Coleman SR. Evolution of the Coleman technique [Internet]. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2022; 150(2):329-36. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009355

13. Shauly O, Gould DJ, Ghavami A. Fat grafting: basic science, techniques, and patient management [Internet]. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery–Global Open. 2022; 10(3):e3987. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003987

14. Venkataram J. Tumescent liposuction: a review [Internet]. Journal of cutaneous and aesthetic surgery. 2008; 1(2):49-57. DOI: 10.4103/0974-2077.44159

15. Moellhoff N, Kuhlmann C, Frank K, Kim BS, Conte F, Cotofana S, et al. Arterial Embolism After Facial Fat Grafting: A Systematic Literature Review [Internet]. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2023; 47(6):2771-87. DOI: 10.1007/s00266-023-03511-y

Downloads

Published

2026-05-19

How to Cite

1.
Nguyen Van P, Le Minh P, Phan Hung P, Nguyen Thanh V. Efficacy and safety of autologous fat grafting for nasolabial fold depressions. Rev. cuba. med. mil [Internet]. 2026 May 19 [cited 2026 May 20];55(2):e026077318. Available from: https://revmedmilitar.sld.cu/index.php/mil/article/view/77318