Structural variation of PHQ-9 by temporal reference in symptom networks of Peruvian adult general population

Authors

Keywords:

depression; memory; patient health questionnaire; psychometrics; statistical models

Abstract

Introduction: The temporal reference frame of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 may influence the organization of depressive symptoms and modify its internal structure in the Peruvian population.

Objective: To evaluate the structural equivalence of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 across 14-day and 12-month temporal reference frames.

Methods: Cross-sectional study based on the Peruvian National Health Survey 2022 and 2024 (n = 63,514). The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 was administered in a single interview using two retrospective temporal reference frames (14 days and 12 months), without longitudinal follow-up. Internal consistency was assessed, and symptom networks, centrality metrics, and structural similarity were estimated.

Results: The instrument showed adequate internal consistency in both temporal frames. The 12-month network exhibited higher density and a redistribution of symptom centrality. Structural overlap between networks was limited.

Conclusions: The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 shows structural variation according to the temporal reference frame, suggesting a lack of equivalence between the 14-day and 12-month versions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Proudman D, Greenberg P, Nellesen D. The growing burden of major depressive disorders (MDD): Implications for researchers and policy makers [Internet]. Pharmacoeconomics. 2021;39(6):619-25. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40273-021-01040-7

2. Liu J, Ning W, Zhang N, Zhu B, Mao Y. Estimation of the global disease burden of depression and anxiety between 1990 and 2044: An analysis of the global burden of disease study 2019 [Internet]. Healthcare (Basel). 2024;12(17):1721. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12171721

3. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure [Internet]. J Gen InternMed. 2001;16(9):606–13.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x

4. Carroll HA, Hook K, Perez OFR, Denckla C, Vince CC, Ghebrehiwet S, et al. Establishing reliability and validity for mental health screening instruments in resource-constrained settings: Systematic review of the PHQ-9 and key recommendations [Internet]. Psychiatry Res. 2020; 291:113236. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113236

5. Anvari F, Efendić E, Olsen J, Arslan RC, Elson M, Schneider IK. Bias in self-reports: An initial elevation phenomenon [Internet]. SocPsychol Personal Sci. 2023;14(6):727-37. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/19485506221129160

6. Fivush R, Grysman A. Accuracy and reconstruction in autobiographical memory: (Re)consolidating neuroscience and sociocultural developmental approaches [Internet]. Wiley Interdiscip Rev CognSci. 2023;14(3):e1620. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1620

7. Faul L, Ford JH, Kensinger EA. Update on “Emotion and autobiographical memory”: 14 years of advances in understanding functions, constructions, and consequences [Internet]. Phys Life Rev. 2024;51:255-72. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2024.10.005

8. Köhler CA, Carvalho AF, Alves GS, McIntyre RS, Hyphantis TN, Cammarota M. Autobiographical memory disturbances in depression: A novel therapeutic target? [Internet]. Neural Plast. 2015 [acceso: 07/09/2025];2015:759139. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/759139

9. Urban EJ, Charles ST, Levine LJ, Almeida DM. Depression history and memory bias for specific daily emotions [Internet]. PLoS One. 2018;13(9):e0203574. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203574

10. Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática (INEI). Encuesta Demográfica y de Salud Familiar – ENDES [Internet]. Lima: INEI; 2025 [acceso: 07/09/2025]. Disponible en: https://proyectos.inei.gob.pe/endes/

11. Epskamp S, Borsboom D, Fried EI. Estimating psychological networks and their accuracy: A tutorial paper [Internet]. Behav Res Methods. 2018;50(1):195–212. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0862-1

12. Borsboom Borsboom D, Deserno MK, Rhemtulla M, Epskamp S, Fried EI, McNally RJ, et al. Network analysis of multivariate data in psychological science [Internet]. Nat Rev Methods Primers. 2021;1(1):58. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43586-021-00055-w

13. Hallford DJ, Rusanov D, Yeow JJE, Barry TJ. Reduced specificity and increased overgenerality of autobiographical memory persist as cognitive vulnerabilities in remitted major depression: A meta-analysis [Internet]. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2022;29(5):1515-29. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2786

14. Stemerding LE, de Beurs D, Arntz A, Kindt M. Mapping emotional memories in depression: An exploratory analysis [Internet]. Cognit Ther Res. 2026;50(2):403-14. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10608-025-10617-x

15. Bulteau S, Malo R, Holland Z, Laurin A, Sauvaget A. The update of self-identity: Importance of assessing autobiographical memory in major depressive disorder [Internet]. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2023;14(3):e1644. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1644

Published

2026-09-03

How to Cite

1.
Guevara Tirado A. Structural variation of PHQ-9 by temporal reference in symptom networks of Peruvian adult general population. Rev. cuba. med. mil [Internet]. 2026 Sep. 3 [cited 2026 Oct. 20];55(3):e026077361. Available from: https://revmedmilitar.sld.cu/index.php/mil/article/view/77361