Relevance of content in initial cycle assessment in medical technology

Authors

Keywords:

curriculum; educational measurement; health education; professional competence; students, health occupations

Abstract

Introduction: The initial cycle assessment constitutes a key formative mechanism to ensure coherence between assessed content and learning outcomes in health higher education. Its relevance directly influences the quality of the educational process and the development of professional competencies.

Objective: To analyze the relevance of content in the initial cycle assessment in medical technology training.

Methods: A quantitative, observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted among fifth-semester students. An evaluation rubric and a self-assessment instrument were used to analyze three formative dimensions: basic, professional, and general. Data were processed using descriptive statistics.

Results: Coherence between evaluation criteria and learning outcomes was observed in most dimensions. However, inconsistencies were identified in the alignment between the rubric and evaluation records, as well as gaps in the integration of theoretical content and its practical application. Weaknesses were noted in the educational domain and transversal competencies, associated with limitations in curricular articulation.

Conclusions: The initial cycle assessment constitutes a relevant mechanism for ensuring educational quality; however, it requires optimization in the design and coherence of its instruments. The incorporation of active pedagogical strategies and curricular alignment enhances the relevance of the assessment process and the development of competencies in health training.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Fu Y, Wang Q, Wang X, Zhong H, Chen J, Fei H, et al. Unlocking academic success: the impact of time management on college students’ study engagement. BMC Psychol. 2025;13:323. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-025-02619-x

2. Huamán Huayta LA, Pucuhuaranga Espinoza TN, Hilario Flores NE. Evaluación del logro del perfil de egreso en grados universitarios: tendencias y desafíos. RIDE Rev Iberoam Investig Desarro Educ. 2020;11(21):e006. DOI: 10.23913/ride.v11i21.691

3. Maldonado-Sánchez M, Aguinaga-Villegas D, Nieto-Gamboa J, Fonseca-Arellano F, Shardin-Flores L, Cadenillas-Albornoz V. Estrategias de aprendizaje para el desarrollo de la autonomía de los estudiantes de secundaria. Propós Represent. 2019;7(2):415-39. DOI: 10.20511/pyr2019.v7n2.290

4. Basurto-Mendoza ST, Moreira-Cedeño JA, Velásquez-Espinales AN, Rodríguez-Gámez M. Autoevaluación, coevaluación y heteroevaluación como enfoque innovador en la práctica pedagógica y su efecto en el proceso de enseñanza-aprendizaje. Polo Conoc. 2021;6(3):828-45. DOI: 10.23857/pc.v6i3.2408

5. Castro C, Moraga A. Evaluación y retroalimentación para los aprendizajes [Internet]. Santiago: Universidad de Chile; 2020. [acceso: 04/05/2026]. Disponible en: https://educacionsuperior.mineduc.cl/wp-content/uploads/sites/49/2020/04/6-Modelo-Evaluacion-y-retroalimentacion-aprendizajes.pdf

6. Duran Chinchilla CM. Análisis de la implementación de resultados de aprendizaje en la educación superior: una revisión investigativa. Sophia. 2024;20(1):1-16. DOI: 10.18634/sophiaj.20v.1i.1356

7. Bizarro Flores WH, Paucar Miranda PJ, Chambi-Mescco E. Evaluación formativa: una revisión sistemática de estudios en aula. Horizontes Rev Investig Cienc Educ. 2021;5(19):872-91. DOI: 10.33996/revistahorizontes.v5i19.244

8. Hirt J, Nordhausen T, Meichlinger J, Braun V, Zeller A, Meyer G. Educational interventions to improve literature searching skills in the health sciences: a scoping review. J Med Libr Assoc. 2020;108(4): 534-46. DOI: 10.5195/jmla.2020.954

9. Arévalo Quijano JC, Castro Paniagua WG, Leguía Carrasco ZJ. La rúbrica como instrumento de evaluación y el desempeño docente con enfoque intercultural en instituciones educativas de primaria en Perú [Internet]. Conrado. 2020 [acceso: 04/05/2026];16(73):14-20. Disponible en: https://conrado.ucf.edu.cu/index.php/conrado/article/view/1264

10. Buelvas-Sánchez SP, Fontalvo Pantoja CR. Mejoramiento del desempeño académico mediante la rúbrica como herramienta de evaluación formativa [Internet]. [Tesis de maestría]. Barranquilla, Colombia: Universidad de la Costa; 2023. [acceso: 04/05/2026]. Disponible en: https://repositorio.cuc.edu.co/handle/11323/10558

11. Camizán García H, Benites Seguín LA, Damián Ponte IF. Estrategias de aprendizaje. TecnoHumanismo. 2021;1(8):1-20. DOI: 10.53673/th.v1i8.40

12. Peralta Lara DC, Guamán Gómez VJ. Metodologías activas para la enseñanza y aprendizaje de los estudios sociales. Soc Tecnol. 2020;3(2):2-10. DOI: 10.51247/st.v3i2.62

13. Steger F, Kizilhan JI. Usable and useful help in literature database search? A pedagogical implementation and the evaluation of an interactive screencast for Iraqi university students. Tech Know Learn. 2022;27: 993-1020. DOI: 10.1007/s10758-021-09523-4

14. Kingsley K, Galbraith GM, Herring M, Stowers E, Stewart T, Kingsley KV. Why not just Google it? An assessment of information literacy skills in a biomedical science curriculum. BMC Med Educ. 2011;11:17. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-17

15. Crespí P, García Ramos JM, Queiruga Dios M. Project-Based Learning (PBL) and its impact on the development of interpersonal competences in higher education. J New Approaches Educ Res. 2022;11(2):259-76. DOI: 10.7821/naer.2022.7.993

16. Fernández-Otoya F, Cabero-Almenara J, Pérez-Postigo G, Bravo J, Alcázar-Holguin MA, Vilca-Rodríguez M. Digital and information literacy in basic-education teachers: a systematic literature review. Educ Sci. 2024;14(2):127. DOI: 10.3390/educsci14020127

Downloads

Published

2026-10-30

How to Cite

1.
Silva Olmos SB. Relevance of content in initial cycle assessment in medical technology. Rev. cuba. med. mil [Internet]. 2026 Oct. 30 [cited 2026 Nov. 1];55(3 (Suplemento 1):e026077754. Available from: https://revmedmilitar.sld.cu/index.php/mil/article/view/77754

Issue

Vol. 55 No. 3 (Suplemento 1) (2026): Teaching in Health

Section

Research Article

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Scarlet Beatriz Silva Olmos

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who have publications with this Journal accept the following terms:

  • The authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the Journal the right of first publication of their work, which will simultaneously be subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License. The content presented here can be shared, copied and redistributed in any medium or format; Can be adapted, remixed, transformed or created from the material, using the following terms: Attribution (giving appropriate credit to the work, providing a link to the license, and indicating if changes have been made); non-commercial (you cannot use the material for commercial purposes) and share-alike (if you remix, transform or create new material from this work, you can distribute your contribution as long as you use the same license as the original work).
  • The authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the published version of the work (for example: depositing it in an institutional electronic archive or publishing it in a monographic volume) as long as the initial publication in this Journal is indicated.
  • Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional electronic archives or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase citations. of the published work.