Surgical outcome of endoscopic endonasal approaches in pituitary adenomas over 15 years

Authors

Keywords:

neuroendoscopy, pituitary adenoma, skull base.

Abstract

Introduction: Pituitary adenomas are common tumors of the sellar region. Surgical resection using endoscopic endonasal approaches constitutes an effective therapeutic option; with a low rate of postoperative morbidity and adequate imaging, endocrinological and ophthalmological control.
Objective: To describe the results of the use of endoscopic endonasal approaches in patients with pituitary adenomas.
Methods: A cross-sectional study was carried out that included 574 patients at the Hermanos Ameijeiras Hospital with a diagnosis of pituitary adenomas who underwent surgery using endoscopic endonasal approaches, in the period from 2009 to 2023. Variables were evaluated: sociodemographic, imaging and histopathological of the tumors, degree of surgical resection, postoperative control and complications. For data analysis, absolute and relative frequencies were used as summary measures.
Results: A 91.3% tumor resection was reported, with endocrinological control in 90.1% and ophthalmological improvement in 87.6%. In relation to the main complications, the following were identified: transient diabetes insipidus 4.0%, hypopituitarism 2.6% and cerebrospinal fluid fistula 2.1%.
Conclusions: Endoscopic endonasal approaches for pituitary adenomas are safe and effective surgical procedures with a low incidence of complications.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Omar López Arbolay, Hospital Clínico Quirúrgico Hermanos "Ameijeiras"

Neurocirujano, Jefe del servicio de Neurocirugía del hospital Clínico Quirúrgico Hermanos " Ameijeiras"

Marlon Manuel Ortiz Machín, Hospital Clínico Quirúrgico Hermanos "Ameijeiras"

Neurocirujano, servicio de Neurocirugía del hospital Clínico Quirúrgico Hermanos " Ameijeiras"

Carlos Roberto Vargas Gálvez, Hospital Clínico Quirúrgico Hermanos "Ameijeiras"

Neurocirujano, servicio de Neurocirugía del hospital Clínico Quirúrgico Hermanos " Ameijeiras"

Adriana Vivian Varela Baró, Hospital Clínico Quirúrgico Hermanos "Ameijeiras"

Neurocirujana, servicio de Neurocirugía del hospital Clínico Quirúrgico Hermanos " Ameijeiras"

References

1. Tritos NA, Miller KK. Diagnosis and Management of Pituitary Adenomas: A Review [Internet]. JAMA. 2023; 329(16):1386-98. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2023.5444

2. Schöning JV, Flitsch J, Lüdecke DK, Fahlbusch R, Buchfelder M, Buslei R, et al. Multiple tumorous lesions of the pituitary gland [Internet]. Hormones (Athens). 2022; 21(4):653-63. DOI: 10.1007/s42000-022-00392-9

3. Acitores Cancela A, Rodríguez Berrocal V, Pian Arias H, Díez JJ, Iglesias P. Effect of pituitary adenoma consistency on surgical outcomes in patients undergoing endonasal endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery [Internet]. Endocrine. 2022; 78(3):559-569. DOI: 10.1007/s12020-022-03161-1

4. Daly AF, Beckers A. The Epidemiology of Pituitary Adenomas [Internet]. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2020; 49(3):347-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecl.2020.04.002

5. Asa SL, Mete O, Perry A, Osamura RY. Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Pituitary Tumors [Internet]. Endocr Pathol. 2022; 33(1):6-26. DOI: 10.1007/s12022-022-09703-7

6. Černý M, Sedlák V, Lesáková V, Francůz P, Netuka D. Methods of preoperative prediction of pituitary adenoma consistency: a systematic review [Internet]. Neurosurg Rev. 2022; 46(1):11. DOI: 10.1007/s10143-022-01909-x

7. Ju JS, Cui T, Chen GW, Chen JL, Ju HB. Meta-analysis on the effect of pituitary adenoma resection on pituitary function [Internet]. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2021; 55(1):24-32. DOI: 10.5603/PJNNS.a2020.0093

8. Choo YH, Seo Y, Kim OL. The outcomes of surgical treatment via transsphenoidal approach for patients with nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma: a single institution's experience [Internet]. Ann Med. 2022; 54(1):3136-3145. DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2022.2140449

9. Pedersen MB, Dukanovic S, Springborg JB, Andreassen M, Krogh J. Endocrine Function after Transsphenoidal Surgery in Patients with Non-Functioning Pituitary Adenomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [Internet]. Neuroendocrinology. 2022; 112(9):823-34. DOI: 10.1159/000522090

10. Pontes JPM, Udoma-Udofa OC, de Oliveira JS, Larcipretti ALL, Dagostin CS, Gomes FC, et al. Efficacy and safety of cavernous sinus medial wall resection in pituitary adenoma surgery: a systematic review and a single-arm meta-analysis [Internet]. Pituitary. 2023; 26(4):340-51. DOI: 10.1007/s11102-023-01332-5

11. Pernik MN, Montgomery EY, Isa S, Sundarrajan C, Caruso JP, Traylor JI, et al. The natural history of non-functioning pituitary adenomas: A meta-analysis of conservatively managed tumors [Internet]. J Clin Neurosci. 2022; 95:134-41. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.12.003

12. Melmed S, Kaiser UB, Lopes MB, Bertherat J, Syro LV, Raverot G, et al. Clinical Biology of the Pituitary Adenoma [Internet]. Endocr Rev. 2022; 43(6):1003-37. DOI: 10.1210/endrev/bnac010

13. Fong KY, Lim MJR, Fu S, Low CE, Chan YH, Deepak DS, et al. Postsurgical outcomes of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas: a patient-level meta-analysis [Internet]. Pituitary. 2023; 26(4):461-73. DOI: 10.1007/s11102-023-01335-2

14. Dhandapani S, Narayanan R, Jayant SS, Sahoo SK, Dutta P, Walia R, et al. Endonasal endoscopic versus microscopic transsphenoidal surgery in pituitary tumors among the young: A comparative study & meta-analysis [Internet]. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021; 200:106411. DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106411

15. Dai W, Zhuang Z, Ling H, Yang Y, Hang C. Systematic review and network meta-analysis assess the comparative efficacy and safety of transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary tumor [Internet]. Neurosurg Rev. 2021; 44(1):515-27. DOI: 10.1007/s10143-020-01240-3

16. Jho HD, Carrau RL, Ko Y, Daly MA. Endoscopic pituitary surgery: an early experience [Internet]. Surg Neurol. 1997; 47(3):213-22. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-3019(96)00452-1

17. Hadad G, Bassagasteguy L, Carrau RL, Mataza JC, Kassam A, Snyderman CH, et al. A novel reconstructive technique after endoscopic expanded endonasal approaches: vascular pedicle nasoseptal flap [Internet]. Laryngoscope. 2006; 116(10):1882-6. DOI: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000234933.37779.e4

18. Elshazly K, Kshettry VR, Farrell CJ, Nyquist G, Rosen M, Evans JJ. Clinical Outcomes After Endoscopic Endonasal Resection of Giant Pituitary Adenomas [Internet]. World Neurosurg. 2018; 114:e447-e456. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.03.006

19. Gaillard S, Adeniran S, Villa C, Jouinot A, Raffin-Sanson ML, Feuvret L, et al. Outcome of giant pituitary tumors requiring surgery [Internet]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022; 13:975560. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.975560

20. Carretta A, Zoli M, Guaraldi F, Sollini G, Rustici A, Asioli S, et al. Endoscopic Endonasal Transplanum-Transtuberculum Approach for Pituitary Adenomas/PitNET: 25 Years of Experience [Internet]. Brain Sci. 2023; 13(7):1121. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci13071121

21. Tao C, Cheng G, Chen Y, Gu P, Hu W. Early outcomes of endoscopic endonasal approach pituitary adenomas resection with minimal nasal injury [Internet]. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021; 100(46):e27843. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027843

22. Wang F, Zhou T, Wei S, Meng X, Zhang J, Hou Y, et al. Endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery of 1,166 pituitary adenomas [Internet]. Surg Endosc. 2015; 29(6):1270-80. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3815-0

23. Zhan R, Ma Z, Wang D, Li X. Pure Endoscopic Endonasal Transsphenoidal Approach for Nonfunctioning Pituitary Adenomas in the Elderly: Surgical Outcomes and Complications in 158 Patients [Internet]. World Neurosurg. 2015; 84(6):1572-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.08.035

24. Chen SH, Sprau A, Chieng L, Buttrick S, Alam ES, Ali SC, et al. Transsphenoidal Approach for Pituitary Adenomas in Elderly Patients [Internet]. World Neurosurg. 2019; 121:e670-e674. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.09.187

25. Yan JL, Chang CN, Chen PY. Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery for resection of pituitary macroadenoma: A retrospective study [Internet]. PLoS One. 2021; 16(8):e0255599. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0255599

26. Yano S, Hide T, Shinojima N. Efficacy and Complications of Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery for Giant Pituitary Adenomas. [Internet]. World Neurosurg. 2017; 99:533-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.12.068

27. Vargas Gálvez C, López Arbolay O, Ortiz Machín M. Estrategia de reparación de la base craneal en los procedimientos endonasales endoscópicos [Internet]. Rev Cubana de Med Mil. 2024 [acceso: 1/4/2024]; 53(2):e024014406. Disponible en: https://revmedmilitar.sld.cu/index.php/mil/article/view/14406

28. Vargas Gálvez CR, López Arbolay O, Ortiz Machín MM, Diego de la Campa JL, Gómez Cardellá MM, León Hernández I, et al. Fibrina rica en plaquetas y leucocitos en abordajes endonasales endoscópicos. Rev Cubana Med Milit [Internet]. 2024 [acceso: 1/4/2024];53(1):e024014264. Disponible en: https://revmedmilitar.sld.cu/index.php/mil/article/view/14264

29. Vargas Gálvez CR, López Arbolay O, Ortiz Machín MM. Barrera de reparación de la base craneal en los abordajes endonasales endoscópicos. Rev Cubana Med Milit [Internet]. 2023 [acceso: 1/4/2024] 52(4):e023014321. Disponible en: https://revmedmilitar.sld.cu/index.php/mil/article/view/14321

Published

2024-06-28

How to Cite

1.
López Arbolay O, Ortiz Machín MM, Vargas Gálvez CR, Varela Baró AV. Surgical outcome of endoscopic endonasal approaches in pituitary adenomas over 15 years. Rev Cubana Med Milit [Internet]. 2024 Jun. 28 [cited 2025 Apr. 3];53(3):e024017888. Available from: https://revmedmilitar.sld.cu/index.php/mil/article/view/17888

Issue

Section

Clinical Practice Article