Endoscopic resection of adenomatous lesions of the colon
Keywords:
adenomatous lesions of the colon, endoscopic resection, polypectomy.Abstract
Introduction: Most colon tumors develop from malignant degeneration of precursor lesions (adenoma-carcinoma sequence). Adenomas are benign lesions that do not recur once they are completely resected. The least invasive treatment for these lesions is endoscopic resection.Objective: To deepen the knowledge related to endoscopic resection techniques of adenomatous lesions of the colon.
Development: The detection of adenomas constitutes a challenge in the early detection strategy for colorectal cancer. Polypectomy is the most important tool for its prevention. The polypectomy technique for tiny, small polyps is variable, and the choice is based on the size of the polyp and the physician's preference. Techniques used include hot loop polypectomy, cold loop polypectomy, cold biopsy forceps, and hot biopsy forceps. These techniques have risks of complications, including bleeding and perforation. The use of electrocautery increases the risk of transmural colon injury, late post-polypectomy hemorrhage, and perforation. Cold loop polypectomy is a technique with well-established safety.
Conclusions: Cold snare polypectomy is superior to cold biopsy forceps for complete resection of minute polyps. Cold loop polypectomy is more effective than forceps techniques in achieving complete resection of the polyp. It also avoids the adverse events associated with thermal electrocautery in hot biopsy forceps and hot loop techniques.
Downloads
References
2. Van Hattem WA, Shahidi N, Vosko S, Hartley I, Britto K, Sidhu M, et al. Piecemeal cold snare polypectomy versus conventional endoscopic mucosal resection for large sessile serrated lesions: a retrospective comparison across two successive periods. Gut. 2021 [acceso: 25/07/2022]; 70(9):1691-7. Disponible en: https://gut.bmj.com/content/70/9/1691.long
3. Mangas Sanjuán C, Jover R, Cubiella J, Marzo Castillejo M, Balaguer Prunés F, Bessa Caserras X, et al. Vigilancia tras resección de pólipos de colon y de cáncer colorrectal. Actualización. 2018. Gastroenterología y hepatología. 2019 [acceso: 25/07/2022]; 42(3):188-201. Disponible en: https://rafalafena.files.wordpress.com/2019/02/2018.vigilanciapostpolipecto-mia.guideline.pdf
4. Utrera-Díaz G, Pérez-Rodríguez L, Toledo-Yanes P. Cáncer colorrectal: factores de riesgo en pacientes mayores de 50 años en Cienfuegos. Revista Finlay. 2021 [acceso: 25/07/2022]; 11(3):aprox. 6 p. Disponible en: http://www.revfinlay.sld.cu/index.php/finlay/article/view/920
5. Ferlitsch M, Moss A, Hassan C, Bhandari P, Dumonceau JM, Paspatis G, et al. Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline. Endoscopy. 2017 [acceso: 25/07/2022]; 49(3):270-97. Disponible en: https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/s-0043-102569.pdf
6. Calderón Reza JC. Cáncer de colon, secuencia adenoma carcinoma y pólipo aserrado. 2018 [acceso: 27/07/2022]; 14(62):52-55. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1990-86442018000200008&lng=es&tlng=es
7. García N, Rojas Y, Trujillo YL, Carmenates BM, Reyes AD, Chiong M. Comportamiento de los pólipos de colon y recto en pacientes sometidos a colonoscopia terapéutica. AMC. 2019 [acceso: 19/10/2022]; 23(2):198-208. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1025-02552019000200198&lng=es
8. Yoriaki Komeda TW, Toshiharu Sakurai. Risk factors for local recurrence and appropriate surveillance interval after endoscopic resection. World J Gastroenterol. 2019 [acceso: 25/07/2022]; 25(12):1502-12. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6441916/
9. Schett B, Wallner J, Weingart V, Ayvaz A, Richter U, Stahl J, et al. Efficacy and safety of cold snare resection in preventive screening colonoscopy. Endosc Int Open. 2017 [acceso: 25/07/2022]; 5(7):580-6. Disponible en: https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/s-0043-105491.pdf
10. Shinozaki S, Kobayashi Y, Hayashi Y, Sakamoto H, Lefor AK, Yamamoto H. Efficacy and safety of cold versus hot snare polypectomy for resecting small colorectal polyps: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Dig Endosc. 2018 [acceso: 25/07/2022]; 30(5):592-9. Disponible en: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/den.13173
11. Zimmer V. Cold snare protrusion. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2018; 42(6):501-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2018.04.001
12. Dumoulin FL, Hildenbrand R. Endoscopic resection techniques for colorectal neoplasia: Current developments. World J Gastroenterol. 2019 [acceso: 25/07/2022]; 25(3):300-7. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6343101/pdf/WJG-25-300.pdf
13. Yamamoto T, Suzuki S, Kusano C, Yakabe K, Iwamoto M, Ikehara H, et al. Histological outcomes between hot and cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2017 [acceso: 25/07/2022]; 23(4):246-52. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5539679/pdf/SJG-23-246.pdf
14. Abe Y, Nabeta H, Koyanagi R, Nakamichi T, Hirashima H, Lefor AK, et al. Extended cold snare polypectomy for small colorectal polyps increases the R0 resection rate. Endosc Int Open. 2018 [acceso: 25/07/2022]; 6(2):254-8. Disponible en: https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/s-0043-125312.pdf
15. Barreto R. Cancer de Colon: del adenoma a la terapeutica endoscopica en oclusion. Revista Endoscopia. 2019; 31(91):54-6. DOI: 10.24875/END.M19000013
16. Moons LMG. Cold snare polypectomy of large lesions: One swallow does not a summer make. Endoscopy. 2018 [acceso: 25/07/2022]; 50(3):200-2. Disponible en: https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/abstract/10.1055/s-0044-100494
17. Takayanagi D, Nemoto D, Isohata N, Endo S, Aizawa M, Utano K, et al. Histological Comparison of Cold versus Hot Snare Resections of the Colorectal Mucosa. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018; 61(8): 964-70. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001109
18. Gómez V, Badillo R, Crook J, Krishna M, Diehl NN, Wallace MB. Diminutive colorectal polyp resection comparing hot and cold snare and cold biopsy forceps polypectomy. Results of a pilot randomized, single-center study. Endosc Int Open. 2015;3(1):76-80. DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1390789
19. Takuji YT, Satoshi A. A comparison of the resection rate for cold and hot snare polypectomy for 4-9 mm colorectal polyps: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Gut. 2017; 67(11):1950-7. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314215
20. Horiuchi A, Ikuse T, Tanaka N. Cold snare polypectomy: Indications, devices, techniques, outcomes and future. Dig Endosc. 2019 [acceso: 25/07/2022]; 31(4):372-7. Disponible en: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/den.13314
21. Suraj Suresh JZ, Abdelwahab Ahmed. Risk factors associated with adenoma recurrence following cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection of polyps ≥ 20 mm: a retrospective chart review. Endosc Int Open. 2021; 9(6):867-73. DOI: 10.1055/a-1399-8398
22. Barros RA, Marc J. Cold snare polypectomy without submucosal injection: safety and efficacy in 615 large serrated lesions. Endosc Int Open. 2021; 9(9):1421-26. DOI: 10.1055/a-1517-4054
23. Jochen Weigt RO, Ahmed Afifi, Diogo Libânio. Cold versus hot polypectomy/ endoscopic mucosal resection-A review of current evidence. United European Gastroenterol J. 2021;9(8):938-46. DOI: 10.1002/ueg2.12130
24. Srinivasan S, Desai M. Is jumbo biopsy forceps comparable to cold snare for diminutive colorectal polyps? - a meta-analysis. Endosc Int Open. 2021; 9(1):9-13. DOI: 10.1055/a-1293-6965
25. Barrios Irene, Anido V, Morera M. Declaración de Helsinki: cambios y exégesis. Rev Cubana Salud Pública. 2016 [acceso: 25/07/2022]; 42(1):132-42. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0864-34662016000100014&lng=es
26. Piraka C, Saeed A, Waljee AK, Pillai A, Stidham R, Elmunzer BJ. Cold snare polypectomy for non-pedunculated colon polyps greater than 1 cm. Endosc Int Open. 2017 [acceso: 25/07/2022]; 5(3):184-189. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5361138/pdf/10-1055-s-0043-101696.pdf
27. Landaeta J, Dias C, Armas V. Lesiones diminutas-pequeñas de colon: técnica de elevación de la mucosa con irrigación forzada con bomba de agua para evidenciar resección completa de lesiones con pinza de biopsia. Gen. 2021 [acceso: 25/07/2022]; 75(1):13-18. Disponible en: http://ve.scielo.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0016-35032021000100013&lng=es
28. Velasco YM, Martínez MG, Ramos RE, García MR, Molina JF, Jaramillo GI, et al. Resección de pólipos colónicos menores a 10 milímetros: experiencia en un Hospital de Tercer Nivel. Endoscopia. 2020 [acceso: 19/10/2022]; 32(2):76-84. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2444-64832020000600076&lng=es
29. Albéniz E, Pellisé M, Gimeno García AZ, Lucendo AJ, Alonso Aguirre PA, Herreros de Tejada A, et al. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2018;110 (3):179-94. DOI: 10.17235/reed.2018.5086/2017
30. Valverde F, Jiménez R, Martínez JG, Redondo E. Resección endoscópica de pólipos de gran tamaño. RAPD online. 2017; 40(2):79-89. Disponible en: https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&cad=rj-a&uact=8&ved=2ahUKEwi287W21Oz6AhVOVTABHWzcBAAQFnoECCoQAQ&url=-https%3A%2F%2Fwww.sapd.es%2Frevista%2F2017%2F40%2F2%2F03%2Fpd-f&usg=AOvVaw10e6EiAt6rg14Oi0ou-i5v
31. Blanco CI, Peláez M, Solana S, Martínez CL, Hernández AI, Cerna J, et al . Guía de abordaje y manejo endoscópico de la hemorragia de tubo digestivo bajo. Endoscopia. 2019 [acceso: 19/10/2022]; 31(1):4-29. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2444-64832019000100004&lng=es
32. Palacios F, Benites H. Eficacia y seguridad de la resección endoscópica en pacientes con pólipos colorrectales no pediculados grandes. Rev. Gastroenterol. Perú. 2017 [acceso: 19/10/2022]; 37(4):305-16. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1022-51292017000400003&lng=es
33. Dolz C, Vilella A. Cromoendoscopia submucosa: una técnica que remarca los epitelios, diferencia los componentes histológicos, y facilita y ofrece seguridad a la polipectomía de colon. Rev. Esp. Enferm. Dig. 2015 [acceso: 19/10/2022]; 107(7):430-5. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1130-01082015000700007&lng=es
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who have publications with this Journal accept the following terms:
- The authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the Journal the right of first publication of their work, which will simultaneously be subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License. The content presented here can be shared, copied and redistributed in any medium or format; Can be adapted, remixed, transformed or created from the material, using the following terms: Attribution (giving appropriate credit to the work, providing a link to the license, and indicating if changes have been made); non-commercial (you cannot use the material for commercial purposes) and share-alike (if you remix, transform or create new material from this work, you can distribute your contribution as long as you use the same license as the original work).
- The authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the published version of the work (for example: depositing it in an institutional electronic archive or publishing it in a monographic volume) as long as the initial publication in this Journal is indicated.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional electronic archives or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase citations. of the published work.