Assessment of an obstetric telemedicine program during the COVID-19 pandemic

Authors

Keywords:

health professionals, midwifery, telehealth, telemedicine.

Abstract

Introduction: Telemedicine has positioned itself as a strategy to improve the quality and coverage of services, but its implementation represents a challenge for health workers.
Objective: To determine the perception of the use of the Telemedicine program during the COVID-19 pandemic among midwifery health professionals.
Methods: Descriptive cross-sectional study carried out on 40 obstetrics professionals working in a telemedicine program in health centers of the Ministry of Health and who were selected non-randomly. A content-validated and reliable questionnaire was used. Frequencies and percentages were estimated.
Results: 45 % agreed that the trainings were timely and efficient, as well as the determination of roles and profiles for a commitment to the program (50 %). However, 47.5 % pointed out the lack of articulation of activities in the different areas. 85 % found the platform user-friendly and 70 % that it had an efficient information registration system. Also, that the program provides timely access to users (60 %), optimizes consultation time and number of users (52.5 %), as well as more flexible timetables (55 %).
Conclusions: Obstetrics professionals highly value the telemedicine program, recognizing it as a useful and technologically appropriate tool for improving healthcare access and quality. Nonetheless, there is a need for better organization and articulation of this technology in professional activities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Steiner RJ, Zapata LB, Curtis KM, Whiteman MK, Brittain AW, Tromble E, et al. COVID-19 and Sexual and Reproductive Health Care: Findings From Primary Care Providers Who Serve Adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2021; 69(3):375-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.06.002

2. Cheng Y, Boerma C, Peck L, Botfield JR, Estoesta J, McGeechan K. Telehealth sexual and reproductive health care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Med J Aust. 2021; 215(8):371-2. DOI: 10.5694/mja2.51219

3. Alharbi F. The Use of Digital Healthcare Platforms During the COVID-19 Pandemic: the Consumer Perspective. Acta Inform Med. 2021; 29(1):51-8. DOI: 10.5455/aim.2021.29.51-58

4. Helou S, El Helou E, Abou-Khalil V, Wakim J, El Helou J, Daher A, et al. The Effect of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Physicians' Use and Perception of Telehealth: The Case of Lebanon. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(13):4866. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17134866

5. Hawrysz L, Gierszewska G, Bitkowska A. The Research on Patient Satisfaction with Remote Healthcare Prior to and during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(10):5338. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18105338

6. Getachew E, Adebeta T, Muzazu SGY, Charlie L, Said B, Tesfahunei HA, et al. Digital health in the era of COVID-19: Reshaping the next generation of healthcare. Front Public Health. 2023; 11(1):942703. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.942703

7. Gozzer E. Una visión panorámica de las experiencias de Telesalud en Perú. Rev perú med exp salud pública. 2015 [acceso: 25/07/2023]; 32(2):385-90. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1726-4634201500020002

8. Pérez-Lu JE, Iguiñiz Romero R, Bayer AM, García PJ. Reduciendo las inequidades en salud y mejorando la salud materna mediante la mejora de los sistemas de información en salud: Wawared Perú. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2015 [acceso: 30/07/2023]; 32(2):373-7. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1726-46342015000200025&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es

9. Assaye BT, Belachew M, Worku A, Birhanu S, Sisay A, Kassaw M, et al. Perception towards the implementation of telemedicine during COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2023; 23(1):967. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09927-1

10. Hincapié MA, Gallego JC, Gempeler A, Piñeros JA, Nasner D, Escobar MF. Implementation and Usefulness of Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review. J Prim Care Community Health. 2020; 11(1):2150132720980612. DOI: 10.1177/2150132720980612

11. John O, Sarbadhikari SN, Prabhu T, Goel A, Thomas A, Shroff S, et al. Implementation and Experiences of Telehealth: Balancing Policies With Practice in Countries of South Asia, Kuwait, and the European Union. Interact J Med Res. 2022; 11(1):e30755. DOI: 10.2196/30755

12. Meza-Santibañez L, Novoa RH, Torres-Osorio J, Jáuregui-Canchari V, Rodríguez-Hilario N, GuevaraRíos E, et al. Implementación de un modelo mixto de atención prenatal, presencial y virtual durante la pandemia COVID-19, en el Instituto Nacional Materno Perinatal en Lima, Perú. Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia. 2021 [acceso: 01/08/2023]; 67(2):1-8. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.pe/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2304-51322021000200004&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es

13. Haleem A, Javaid M, Singh RP, Suman R. Telemedicine for healthcare: Capabilities, features, barriers, and applications. Sens Int. 2021; 2(1):100117. DOI: 10.1016/j.sintl.2021.100117

14. Mera A. Percepción del uso de la telemedicina durante la emergencia sanitaria por la COVID-19 en profesionales de obstetricia de Lima Metropolitana, 2020. [Título Profesional de Licenciada en Obstetricia]. Lima: Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos; 2021. [acceso: 27/01/2024]. Disponible en: https://cybertesis.unmsm.edu.pe/handle/20.500.12672/17475

15. Ashfaq A, Memon SF, Zehra A, Barry S, Jawed H, Akhtar M, et al. Knowledge and Attitude Regarding Telemedicine Among Doctors in Karachi. Cureus. 2020; 12(2):e6927. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.6927

16. Velázquez M, Pacheco A, Silva M, Sosa D. Evaluation of the teleconsultation process from the perspective of the provider. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2017; 41(4):e22. DOI: 10.26633/RPSP.2017.22

17. Kayyali R, Hesso I, Mahdi A, Hamzat O, Adu A, Nabhani Gebara S. Telehealth: misconceptions and experiences of healthcare professionals in England. Int J Pharm Pract. 2017; 25(3):203-9. DOI: 10.1111/ijpp.12340

18. Ly BA, Labonté R, Bourgeault IL. The beliefs of Senegal's physicians toward the use of telemedicine. Pan Afr Med J. 2019; 34(1):97. DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2019.34.97.20216

19. Ayatollahi H, Sarabi FZ, Langarizadeh M. Clinicians' Knowledge and Perception of Telemedicine Technology. Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2015 [acceso: 22/02/2023]; 12(Fall):1c. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4632872/

20. Acharya RV, Rai JJ. Evaluation of patient and doctor perception toward the use of telemedicine in Apollo Tele Health Services, India. J Family Med Prim Care. 2016; 5(4):798-803. DOI: 10.4103/2249-4863.201174

21. Albarrak AI, Mohammed R, Almarshoud N, Almujalli L, Aljaeed R, Altuwaijiri S, et al. Assessment of physician's knowledge, perception and willingness of telemedicine in Riyadh region, Saudi Arabia. J Infect Public Health. 2021; 14(1):97-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2019.04.006

Downloads

Published

2024-05-16

How to Cite

1.
Mera-Yauri A, Pantes-Salas G, Obregón-Morales DM, Común-Gutierrez DK, Barja-Ore J. Assessment of an obstetric telemedicine program during the COVID-19 pandemic. Rev Cubana Med Milit [Internet]. 2024 May 16 [cited 2025 Jan. 9];53(2):e024026091. Available from: https://revmedmilitar.sld.cu/index.php/mil/article/view/26091

Issue

Vol. 53 No. 2 (2024): April - June

Section

Research Article

License

Authors who have publications with this Journal accept the following terms:

  • The authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the Journal the right of first publication of their work, which will simultaneously be subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License. The content presented here can be shared, copied and redistributed in any medium or format; Can be adapted, remixed, transformed or created from the material, using the following terms: Attribution (giving appropriate credit to the work, providing a link to the license, and indicating if changes have been made); non-commercial (you cannot use the material for commercial purposes) and share-alike (if you remix, transform or create new material from this work, you can distribute your contribution as long as you use the same license as the original work).
  • The authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the published version of the work (for example: depositing it in an institutional electronic archive or publishing it in a monographic volume) as long as the initial publication in this Journal is indicated.
  • Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional electronic archives or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase citations. of the published work.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>