Spontaneous pneumothorax
Keywords:
spontaneous pneumothorax, pleurostomy, smoking.Abstract
Introduction: Spontaneous pneumothorax is the most frequent cause of urgent admission to thoracic surgery services.Objective: To characterize patients admitted with a diagnosis of spontaneous pneumothorax.
Methods: A descriptive study of 93 patients with a clinical and radiological diagnosis of spontaneous pneumothorax was carried out, the study variables were established and absolute frequencies and percentages were used. For the association of the variables, the chi square statistic was used with a confidence level of 95 %.
Results: Primary spontaneous pneumothorax predominated (65,5 %), the male sex was the most affected (80,6 %), with greater frequency in the right hemithorax (72,2 %) and smoking as the antecedent (83,9 %). Minimal pleurostomy was the definitive treatment in 72 % of the patients. The most frequent complication after pleurostomy was persistent air leak. Surgical treatment with mechanical pleurodesis offered 100% effectiveness. There was not surgical mortality.
Conclusions: Spontaneous pneumothorax predominated in males in a ratio of 4.2: 1, in patients under 40 years of age. The most associated personal pathological history was chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The predominant symptom was chest pain. Primary spontaneous pneumothorax was more frequent and the right hemithorax the most affected. Smoking was present as a history in both types of spontaneous pneumothorax. The most widely used treatment modality was minimal pleurostomy.
Downloads
References
2. Onuki T, Ueda S, Yamaoka M, Sekiya Y, Yamada H, Kawakami N, et al. Primary and Secondary Spontaneous Pneumothorax: Prevalence, Clinical Features, and In-Hospital Mortality. Canadian Respiratory Journal. 2017 [acceso: 23/02/2021]; 2017:6014967. DOI: 10.1155/2017/6014967
3. Garófalo Espinel AC, Grisman Laverde JL, Quiroga Álvarez JE, Arcos Vizcarra PS. Neumotórax espontáneo, diagnóstico y tratamiento. Revista Recimundo. 2020 [acceso: 27/2/2021]; 4(4): 300-9. DOI: 10.26820/recimundo/4.(4).octubre.2020.300-309
4. Brito-Sosa G, Iraizoz Barrios AM. Neumotórax espontáneo y Enfisema Bulloso Bilateral. Rev. Colomb. Cir. 2021[acceso: 23/3/2021]; 36(1): 155-60. DOI: 10.30944/20117582.122
5. Mederos Curbelo ON, Barrera Ortega JC, Guerra Pereda E, Da Costa Fernández JM. Pneumothorax and ruptured giant emphysematous bulla as a manifestation of carcinoma. Rev. Cub. Cir. 2010 [acceso: 9/3/2021]; 49(4):52-57. Disponible en: https://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-74932010000400007&lng=es
6. Onuki T, Kawamura T, Kawabata S, Shuntaro K, Masatoshi Y, Masaharu I. Neo-generation of neo genetic bullae after surgery for spontaneous pneumothorax in young adults: a prospective study. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 [acceso: 23/2/2021]; 14:20: [aprox. 7 pant.]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-019-0848-4
7. Burch A. Management of the Patient with Spontaneous Pneumothorax. Medsurge nursing. 2020 [acceso: 26/2/2021]; 29(3):209-10. Disponible en: https://insights.ovid.com/medsurgnursing/mednu/2020/05/000/mana-gement-patient-spontaneous-pneumothorax/13/00008484
8. Dietrich A, Croattini S, Olivera S, Raices M, Montagne J, Smith D. Resultados a largo plazo del manejo expectante del primer episodio de neumotórax espontáneo primario. ¿Es una opción terapéutica segura? Revista Americana de Medicina Respiratoria. 2020 [acceso: 28/2/2021]; 2:118- 24. Disponible en: https://www.ramr.org/articulos/volumen_20_numero_2/articulos_origi-nales/articulos_originales_resultados_a_largo_plazo-_del_manejo_expectante_del_primer_episodio_de_neumotorax_esp-ontaneo_primario.pdf
9. Saker Diffalah Y, Deus Fombellida J. Neumotórax Espontáneo: Revisión bibliográfica. [Trabajo Fin de Grado Medicina]. Zaragoza: Departamento de Cirugía, Universidad Zaragoza, Facultad de Medicina; 2017. [acceso: 26/02/2021]. Disponible en: https://zaguan.unizar.es/record/70446/files/TAZ-TFG-2017-1037.pdf
10. Valencia JC, Zamarriego RJ, Bejarano M, Arzayuz L. Drenaje percutáneo con catéter del neumotórax en pacientes con Covid-19. Rev. Colomb. Cir. 2020 [acceso: 28/2/2021]; 35(3):404-13. DOI: 10.30944/20117582.772
11. Acosta SDR, Abad FM, Legra AN. Neumotórax catamenial. Presentación de un caso. RIC. 2019 [acceso: 21/02/2021]; 98(6):794-801. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/revinfcie/ric-2019/ric196l.pdf
12. Reyna-Villasmil E, Torres-Cepeda D, Rondon-Tapia M, Neumotórax catamenial recurrente. Reporte de caso. Rev. Peru Ginecol Obstet. 2020 [acceso: 27/02/2021]; 66(3): [aprox. 6 pant.]. DOI: 10.31403/rpgo.v66i2263
13. Cárdenas VCA, Ramos CAE, Aranda AJ. Neumotórax espontáneo recidivante a pesar de múltiples intervenciones quirúrgicas. Revista 16 de abril. 2020 [acceso: 27/2/2021]; 59(277): 1-4. Disponible en: https://www.rev16deabril.sld.cu/index.php/16_04/article/view/824/-pdf_262
14. In Sub K, Kim JJ, Han JW, Jeong SC, Kim YH. Conservative treatment for recurrent secondary spontaneous pneumothorax in patients with a long recurrence-free interval. J Thorac Dis. 2020 [acceso: 26/02/2021]; 12(5):2459-66. DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2020.03.52
15. Hallifax RJ, Goldacre R, Landray MJ, Rahman NM, Goldacre MJ. Trends in the Incidence and Recurrence of Inpatient-Treated Spontaneous Pneumothorax, 1968-2016. JAMA. 2018 [acceso: 27/02/2021]; 320(14):1471-80. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2018.14299
16. Walker SP, Bibby AC, Halford P, Stadon L, White P, Maskell NA. Recurrence rates in primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. Respir. J. 2018 [acceso: 23/02/2021]; 52(3): 1-10. DOI: 10.1183/13993003.00864-2018
17. Sainz Menéndez BA. Actualización sobre Neumotórax. Rev. Cub. Cir. 2013[acceso: 27/2/2021]; 52(1):1-14. Disponible en: https://www.sld.cu/galerias/pdf/uvs/cirured/neumotorax2.pdf
18. Cal Vázquez I. Neumotórax espontáneo primario, ¿dónde podemos mejorar? Rev Patol Respir. 2020[acceso: 02/03/2021]; 23(4):123-4. Disponible en: https://www.revistadepatologiarespiratoria.org/descargas/PR_23-4_-123-124.pdf
19. Esquivel Ramírez DF, Hernández Negrete EL, Tupiza Luna FK, Barcia Velásquez CA. Manejo de neumotórax espontaneo. Revista Recimundo. 2021 [acceso: 27/2/2021]; 5(1): 50-6. DOI: 10.26820/recimundo/5.(1).enero.2021.50-56
20. Mederos Curbelo ON, Adefna Pérez RI, Armas Pérez BA, Barrera Ortega JC, Canals Rabasa PP, Cantero Ronquillo AH, et al. Cirugía torácica. Comentarios de casos clínico-quirúrgicos. 1ra ed. La Habana: Editorial Ciencias Médicas; 2012. [acceso: 22/02/2021]. Disponible en: https://www.bvs.sld.cu/libros/cirugia_toracica/cirugia_toracica-_completo.pdf
21. Barrera Ortega JC, Moret González J, Mederos Curbelo ON, Valdez Jiménez J, Romero Díaz C, Cantero Ronquillo A. Tratamiento del neumotórax espontáneo en nuestro medio. Rev. Cubana Cir. 2005 [acceso: 25/02/2021]; 44(1): [aprox. 7 pant.]. Disponible en: https://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-74932005000100007&lng=es
22. Aguinagalde B, Zabaleta J, Fernández-Monge A, López I, Izquierdo JM, Redin J A, et al. Manual versus digital aspiration for first-line treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax. The AMVADI study: a randomized clinical trial. Archivos de Bronconeumología. 2020 [acceso: 23/03/2021]; 56(10): 637-42. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arbres.2020.01.016
23. Cardillo G, Ricciardi S, Rahman N, Walker S, Maskell NA. Primary spontaneous pneumothorax: time for surgery at first episode? J Thorac Dis. 2019 [acceso: 23/03/2021];11(9): 1393-7. DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.03.22
24. Olesen WH, Katballe N, Sindby JE, Titlestad IL, Andersen PE, Lindahl-Jacobsen R, Licht PB. Surgical treatment versus conventional chest tube drainage in primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 [acceso: 23/02/2021]; 54(1): 113-21. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy003
25. Daemen JHT, Lozekoot PWJ, Maessen JG, Gronenschild MHM, Bootsma GP, Hulsewé KWE, et al. Chest tube drainage versus video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for a first episode of primary spontaneous pneumothorax: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019 [acceso: 23/03/2021]; 56(5):819-29. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezz116
26. Jong Hyuk L, Ryul K, Chang Min P. Chest Tube Drainage Versus Conservative Management as the Initial Treatment of Primary Spontaneous Pneumothorax: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. 2020 [acceso: 23/03/2021]; 9(11):3456. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9113456
27. Brown SGA, Ball EL, Perrin K, Asha SE, Braithwaite I, Egerton Warburton D, et al. Conservative versus Interventional Treatment for Spontaneous Pneumothorax. N Engl J Med. 2020 [acceso: 23/03/2021]; 382(5):405-15. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910775
28. Aguinagalde B. Neumotórax espontáneo primario. Mejora de la práctica clínica basada en la evidencia. [Tesis doctoral]. País Vasco: Universidad del País Vasco, Escuela de Máster y Doctorado; 2016. [acceso: 23/03/2021]. Disponible en: https://addi.ehu.es/bitstream/handle/10810/26190/TESIS_AGU-INAGALDE_VALIENTE_BORJA.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who have publications with this Journal accept the following terms:
- The authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the Journal the right of first publication of their work, which will simultaneously be subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License. The content presented here can be shared, copied and redistributed in any medium or format; Can be adapted, remixed, transformed or created from the material, using the following terms: Attribution (giving appropriate credit to the work, providing a link to the license, and indicating if changes have been made); non-commercial (you cannot use the material for commercial purposes) and share-alike (if you remix, transform or create new material from this work, you can distribute your contribution as long as you use the same license as the original work).
- The authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the published version of the work (for example: depositing it in an institutional electronic archive or publishing it in a monographic volume) as long as the initial publication in this Journal is indicated.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional electronic archives or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase citations. of the published work.