Correction of vaginal vault prolapse by abdominal colpopexy

Authors

Keywords:

vaginal vault prolapse, abdominal colpopexy.

Abstract

Introduction: Pelvic floor dysfunctions are considered a health problem in the world, and constitute one of the most common indications for gynecological surgery. Among its variants is the prolapse of the vaginal vault.
Objectives: To evaluate the results of the correction of the vaginal vault prolapse by the colpopexy technique by means of fixation with aponeurotic strips to the anterior abdominal wall.
Methods: An observational, descriptive, retrospective study was carried out. The variables used were age, presence of comorbidities, the number of previous surgeries and the degree of subjective satisfaction of the patients after the procedure.]
Results: There was a predominance of advanced ages in the sample studied with 89.5% of patients older than 55 years. In most of the patients, one or more comorbidities were found that favored the presence of this condition. A total of 8 patients had undergone previous corrective surgery for the prolapse (30.7%). One month after surgery, 80.7% had a score of 1-3 on the evaluation, a value that increased and reached 96.1% at 3 months, and 100% at 6 months, and one year.
Conclusions: Vaginal vault prolapse correction by mean of abdominal way colpopexy is therapeutic alternative, mainly young, and those who want to preserve vaginal functionality, and active sexual life.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Pérez-Rodríguez N, Martínez-Torres J, García-Delgado J, Rodríguez-Adams E, Rodríguez-Lara H. Disfunción de suelo pélvico y sexual en mujeres. Investigaciones Medico quirúrgicas. 2019 [acceso: 18/04/2022]; 11(1):1-25. Disponible en: http://www.revcimeq.sld.cu/index.php/imq/article/view/470

2. Cruz-Hernández M, Barreras-González J, Gallinat-Martin Y, Morera-Pérez M. Sacrocolpopexia laparoscópica como modalidad de tratamiento en las pacientes con prolapso de cúpula vaginal. Revista Cubana de Obstetricia y Ginecología. 2018 [acceso: 16/04/2022]; 43(4):[aprox. 6 p.]. Disponible en: http://www.revginecobstetricia.sld.cu/index.php/gin/article/view/193

3. Leyva-Vázquez F, García-Rodríguez M. Histerectomía vaginal convencional y vaginal asistida por laparoscopia en pacientes sin prolapso uterino. Archivo Médico Camagüey. 2021 [acceso: 11/04/2022]; 25(3):[aprox. 12 p.]. Disponible en: http://revistaamc.sld.cu/index.php/amc/article/view/7848

4. Romero Barra P, Viguera Torrealba S, Pineda Alarcón R, Miranda Hermosilla V. Histeropexia vs histerectomí¬a para el tratamiento quirúrgico del prolapso genital: revisión sistemática. Ars Medica. 2019 [acceso: 18/04/2022]; 44(3):54-61. https://doi.org/10.11565/arsmed.v44i3.1555

5. De Petris Valentina V, Laiz Domingo R, Castro Francisco L. Técnicas obliterativas en el tratamiento quirúrgico del prolapso genital femenino. Experiencia en el Servicio de Salud Metropolitano Oriente, Santiago-Chile. Rev. Chil. Obstet. Ginecol. 2017 [acceso: 18/04/2022]; 82(5):480-90. Disponible en: https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0717-75262017000500480

6. Fonnegra Miramón A, Guzmán Alandete RD. Tratamiento del prolapso de cúpula vaginal por la colpocistopexia vía abdominal. Rev. Colomb. Obstet. Ginecol. 1963 [acceso: 10/04/2022]; 14(6):631-5. Disponible en: https://revista.fecolsog.org/index.php/rcog/article/view/2421

7. Kaplan F, Quinchavil H, Riera P, Flores R, Becerra O, Hevia T. Colposacropexia abdominal abierta con malla mixta en el prolapso de cúpula vaginal: experiencia en el Hospital de Quilpué, Chile. Rev. Chil. Obstet. Ginecol. 2015 [acceso: 22/09/2022]; 80(3):215-20. Disponible en: https://www.scielo.cl/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0717-75262015000300003

8. Espinal- Rodríguez JM, Espinal-Madrid JM, Sabillón-Vallejo JE, Bustillo-Fiallos M, Rosales A. Prolapso de cúpula vaginal y su corrección. Caso clínico y revisión de literatura. Rev Med Hondur. 2016 [acceso: 12/05/2022]; 84(1,2):41-4. Disponible en: http://www.bvs.hn/RMH/pdf/2016/pdf/Vol84-1-2-2016-9.pdf

9. Douglas S, Lutz A, McVary KT, Masson P, Winters JC, Laborde E. Validation of the Patient Global Impression of Improvement for Penile Prosthesis. Ochsner J. 2016 [acceso: 12/05/2022]; 16(4):492-5. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5158156/

10. Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009; 250(2):187-96. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2

11. Asociación Médica Mundial (AMM). Declaración de Helsinki de la AMM: Principios éticos para las investigaciones médicas en seres humanos. Brasil, Fortaleza: 64ª Asamblea General AMM; 2013 [acceso: 18/04/2020]. Disponible en: http://repositorio.mederi.com.co/bitstream/handle/123456789/386/-Declaracion-Helsinki-2013-Esp.pdf?sequence=1

12. Pisón R, Laufer J, Scasso S, Blengio V, Pertuso I, Bentancor V, et al. Corrección del defecto apical. Revisión y serie de casos. Archivos de Ginecología y Obstetricia. 2021 [acceso: 24/04/2022]; 59(2):106-18. Disponible en: https://ago.uy/descargar/adjunto/76-jkofeq-ago59-2-art3.pdf

13. Dahl Pedersen K, Hojriis Storkholm M, Moller Bek K , Glavind-Kristensen M, Greisen S. Recurrent apical prolapse after high uterosacral ligament suspension in a heterogenous cohort characterised by a high prevalence of previous pelvic operations. BMC Women's Health. 2019 [acceso: 24/04/2022]; 19:96. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-019-0800-8

14. Franklin JE. Prolapso de cúpula vaginal, prevalencia en mujeres en climaterio, en el Quindío, Colombia, 2007-2017. Urol Colomb. 2021 [acceso: 24/04/2022]; 30:40-47. Disponible en: https://www.thieme-connect.com/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/s-0040-1714723.pdf

15. De Petris V, Laiz D, Castro F. Técnicas obliterativas en el tratamiento quirúrgico del prolapso genital femenino. Experiencia en el Servicio de Salud Metropolitano Oriente, Santiago-Chile. Rev. Chil. Obstet. Ginecol. 2017 [acceso: 19/03/2022]; 82(5):480-90. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0717-75262017000500480

16. Cruz-Hernández M, Barreras-González J, Gallinat-Martin Y, Morera-Pérez M. Recurrencia en pacientes intervenidas mediante sacrocolpopexia laparoscópica por prolapso de cúpula vaginal posthisterectomía. Rev Cub Obst Ginecol. 2018 [acceso: 19/03/2022]; 43(4):33-42. Disponible en: http://www.revginecobstetricia.sld.cu/index.php/gin/article/view/222

17. Park YH, Yang SC, Park ST, Park SH, Kim HB. Laparoscopic reconstructive surgery is superior to vaginal reconstruction in the pelvic organ prolapse. Int J Med Sci. 2014 [acceso: 19/03/2022]; 11(11):1082-8. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4147633/

18. Rondón-Tapia M, Reyna-Villasmil E, Mejía-Montilla J, Reyna-Villasmil N, Torres-Cepeda D, Fernández-Ramírez A. Culdoplastía de Mayo o colposacropexia abdominal en la corrección del prolapso de la cúpula vaginal post histerectomía. Revista científica INSPILIP. 2018 [acceso: 19/03/2022]; 2(2):1-15. Disponible en: https://docs.bvsalud.org/biblioref/2019/02/980300/culdoplastia-de-mayo-o-colposacropexia-abdominal.pdf

19. Sutkin G, Zyczynski HM, Sridhar A, Jelovsek JE, Rardin CR, Mazloomdoost D, et al. Association between Adjuvant Posterior Repair and Success of Native Tissue Apical Suspension. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 [acceso: 19/03/2022]; 222(2):161.e1-161.e8. Disponible en https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.08.024

Downloads

Published

2023-01-01

How to Cite

1.
Reyes Guerrero EJ, Urgellés Carreras SA, Rodríguez Iglesias G, González Marshall R, Ramos Zamora V, Gil Agramonte E. Correction of vaginal vault prolapse by abdominal colpopexy. Rev Cubana Med Milit [Internet]. 2023 Jan. 1 [cited 2024 Dec. 29];52(1):e02302139. Available from: https://revmedmilitar.sld.cu/index.php/mil/article/view/2139

Issue

Vol. 52 No. 1 (2023): January - March

Section

Brief Communication

License

Authors who have publications with this Journal accept the following terms:

  • The authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the Journal the right of first publication of their work, which will simultaneously be subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License. The content presented here can be shared, copied and redistributed in any medium or format; Can be adapted, remixed, transformed or created from the material, using the following terms: Attribution (giving appropriate credit to the work, providing a link to the license, and indicating if changes have been made); non-commercial (you cannot use the material for commercial purposes) and share-alike (if you remix, transform or create new material from this work, you can distribute your contribution as long as you use the same license as the original work).
  • The authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the published version of the work (for example: depositing it in an institutional electronic archive or publishing it in a monographic volume) as long as the initial publication in this Journal is indicated.
  • Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional electronic archives or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase citations. of the published work.

Most read articles by the same author(s)