Support systems for abdominal reoperation prognosis
Keywords:
prognosis, reoperation, postoperative complications, scores.Abstract
Prognosis support systems are one of the contemporary medicine's great contributions to the practice of this profession, due to their usefulness in prevention, prediction, individualization and participation of the patient in decision-making, even for auditing purposes. In the case of postoperative complications, the application of these supporting systems to the clinical method makes it possible to increase diagnostic certainty and therefore the quality of medical care. The objective of this article is to specify, by means of questions and answers, the characteristics, advantages and disadvantages of the prognosis aid systems used in the postoperative period for the prediction of those complications, as well as the benefits of the application of a system recently validated in a multicentric study, which draws on the best available evidence for the benefit of patient safety.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
1. van Ruler O, Mahler CW, Boer KR, Reuland EA, Gooszen HG, Opmeer BC, et al. Comparison of On-Demand vs Planned Relaparotomy Strategy in Patients With Severe Peritonitis. A Randomized Trial. JAMA. 2007 [acceso: 29/06/2022]; 298(8):865-72. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.298.8.865
2. Van Ruler O, Boermeester MA. Surgical treatment of secondary peritonitis. Der Chirurg. 2017; 88(Suppl 1):[aprox 5p.]. DOI: 10.1007/s00104-015-0121-x
3. Sartelli M, Catena F, Abu-Zidan FM, Ansaloni L, Biffl WL, Boermeester MA, et al. Management of intra-abdominal infections: recommendations by the WSES 2016 consensus conference. World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2017 [acceso: 29/06/2022]; 12(1):[aprox 22 p.]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-017-0132-7
4. García-Gómez JM, Tortajada S, Sáez C. Sistemas de Ayuda a la Decisión Médica. Valencia: Editorial Universidad Politécnica de Valencia; 2019 [acceso: 29/06/2022]. Disponible en: https://riunet.upv.es/bitstream/handle/10251/123418/Garc%C3%ADa%3BS-%C3%A1ez%3BTortajada%20-%20Sistemas%20de%20ayuda%20a%20la%20decisi%C3%B3n%20m%C3-%A9dica.pdf?sequence=1
5. Schorr C, Towsend SR. Chapter 67. Performance Improvement and Severity Scores En: Parrillo J, Dellinger P, editores. Critical Care Medicine: Principles of diagnosis and management in the adults, Section 8: Administrative, Ethical, and Psychological Issues in the Care of the Critically Ill. 5th ed. Elsevier; 2018 [acceso: 29/06/2022]. 1127-37.e4 p. Disponible en: https://www.elsevier.com/books/critical-care-medicine/parrillo/978-0-323-44676-1
6. Peña AE, Chang A. Capítulo 3. Sistemas de valoración pronóstica en Medicina Intensiva. En: Caballero A, editor. Terapia Intensiva I. 3ra Ed. La Habana: ECIMED; 2020. p 51-122.
7. Tolonen M, Coccolini F, Ansaloni L, Sartelli M, Roberts DJ, McKee JL, et al. Getting the invite list right: a discussion of sepsis severity scoring systems in severe complicated intra-abdominal sepsis and randomized trial inclusion criteria. World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2018 [acceso: 29/06/2022]; 13:[aprox 1p.]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-018-0177-2
8. Rausei S, Pappalardo V, Ruspi L, Colella A, Giudici S, Ardita V, et al. Early Versus Delayed Source Control in Open Abdomen Management for Severe Intra-abdominal Infections: A Retrospective Analysis on 111 Cases. World Journal of Surgery. 2018 [acceso: 29/06/2022]; 42(3):[aprox 5 p.]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4233-y
9. Rodríguez Fernández Z, Fernández López O, Maren GO, Romero García LI. Algunas consideraciones sobre las infecciones posoperatorias. Revista Cubana de Cirugía. 2017 [acceso: 29/06/2022]; 56:46-58. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-74932017000200005&nrm=iso
10. Altemeier WA, Burke JF, Pruitt BAJr., Sandusky WR. Manual on control of infection in surgical patients. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PAJB: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1984.
11. Otero CH. Factores de riesgo de infección del sitio quirúrgico. Revista Venezolana de Cirugía. 2017 [acceso: 29/06/2022]; 70(1):[aprox 3p.]. Disponible en: https://www.revistavenezolanadecirugia.com/index.php/revista/article/view/28
12. World Health Organization. Important Issues in the Approach to Surgical Site Infection Prevention. Geneve: Global Guidelines for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection; 2018. [acceso: 29/06/2022]. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/infection-prevention/tools/surgical/SSI-surveillance-protocol.pdf
13. Kirkpatrick AW, Coccolini F, Ansaloni L, Roberts DJ, Tolonen M, McKee JL, et al. Closed Or Open after Source Control Laparotomy for Severe Complicated Intra-Abdominal Sepsis (the COOL trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2018; 13(1):[aprox 1p.]. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-018-0183-4
14. Knaus WA, Zimmerman JC, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Lawrence DE. APACHE acute physiology and chronic health evaluation a physiologically based classification system. Crit Care Med. 1981; 9:[aprox 6p.]. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-198108000-00008
15. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonça A, Bruining H, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. Intensive Care Medicine. 1996; 22(7):[aprox 4p.]. DOI: 10.1007/BF01709751
16. Vincent JL, Moreno R. Clinical review: Scoring systems in the critically ill. Critical Care. 2010 [acceso: 29/06/2022]; 14(2):[aprox 1p.]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1186/cc8204
17. Reintam A, Malbrain ML, Starkopf J, Fruhwald S, Jakob SM, De Waele J, et al. Gastrointestinal function in intensive care patients: terminology, definitions and management. Recommendations of the ESICM Working Group on Abdominal Problems. Intensive Care Med. 2012; 38:[aprox 10 p.]. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-011-2459-y
18. Elebute EA, Stoner HB. The grading of sepsis. Br J Surg. 1983; 70:29-31. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800700111
19. Dominioni L, Dionigi R. The grading of sepsis and the assessment of its prognosis in the surgical patient: a review. Surg Res Comm. 1987 [acceso: 26/07/2022]; 1:1-11. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306198091_The_grading_of_-sepsis_and_the_assessment_of_its_prognosis_in_the_surgical_patient_A_review
20. Teichmann W, Whittmann DH, Andreone PA. Scheduled reoperations (ettapenlavage) for diffuse peritonitis Arch Surg. 1986; 121: [aprox 5p.]. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1986.01400020033002
21. Wacha HLM, Feldman U. Mannheim Peritonitis Index: Prediction of risk of death from peritonitis. Construction of a statistical and validation of an empirically based index. Theoret Surg. 1987; 1:169-77. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3568820/
22. Scapellato S, Parrinelo V, Sciuto GS, Castorina G, Buffone A, Cirino E. Valuation on prognostic factors about secondary acute peritonitis: review of 255 cases. Ann Ital Chir. 2004 [acceso: 29/06/2022]; 75(2):[aprox 4p]. Disponible en: http://europepmc.org/article/MED/15386997
23. Ranson JH. Diagnostic standards for acute Pancreatitis. World J Surg. 1997; 21:[aprox 6p.]. DOI: 10.1007/s002689900205
24. Biondo S, Ramos E, Fraccalvieri D, Kreisler E, Marti J, Jaurrieta E. Comparative study of left colonic Peritonitis Severity Score and Mannheim Peritonitis Index. Br J Surg. 2006; 93:[aprox 6p.]. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5326
25. Thorsen K, Søreide JA, Søreide K. Scoring systems for outcome prediction in patients with perforated peptic ulcer. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. 2013 [acceso: 29/06/2022]; 21:25. Disponible en: http://www.sjtrem.com/content/21/1/25
26. Copeland GP. The POSSUM System of Surgical Audit. Archives of Surgery. 2002 [acceso: 29/6/2022]; 137(1):15-9. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.137.1.15
27. Pusajó JFBE, Doglio G, Cherjovsky MR, Lipinszki AI, Hernández MS, Egurrola MA. Postoperative intra-abdominal sepsis requiring reoperation. Arch Surg. 1993 [acceso: 29/06/2022]; 128:[aprox 5p.]. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/14768433
28. van Ruler O, Kiewiet JJ, Boer KR, Lamme B, Gouma DJ, Boermeester MA, et al. Failure of available scoring systems to predict ongoing infection in patients with abdominal sepsis after their initial emergency laparotomy. BMC surgery. 2011;11:[aprox 1p.]. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2482-11-38
29. Lombardo Vaillant TA, Soler Morejón C, Lombardo Vaillan J, Casamayor Laime Z. Aplicación del índice predictivo de reintervención abdominal en el diagnóstico de complicaciones infecciosas intraabdominales. Rev Cub Med Mil. 2009 [acceso: 29/06/2022]; 38(1):[aprox 9p.]. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0138-65572009000100002&lng=es
30. Kamil RF, Lalisang TJ, Kekalih A. Merit of APACHE II, MPI and ARPI scores as determinants On Demand Relaparotomy. The New Ropanasuri Journal of Surgery. 2016 [acceso: 29/06/2022]; 1(1):[aprox 8p.]. Disponible en: https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/nrjs/vol1/iss1/5
31. González Aguilera JC. Índices y factores pronóstico en pacientes con peritonitis difusas secundarias [Tesis Doctoral]. Granma, Bayamo: Universidad de Granma; 2004. Disponible en: http://tesis.sld.cu/index.php?P=FullRecord&ID=30
32. Cervantes Betancourt JR. Nuevo índice predictivo para relaparotomías [Tesis Doctoral]. Santa Clara, Villa Clara: Universidad de Ciencias Médicas; 2008. Disponible en: http://tesis.sld.cu/index.php?P=FullRecord&ID=516
33. Soler-Morejón CD, Tamargo-Barbeito TO, Malbrain M. Modelo de pronóstico de reoperación en cirugía abdominal. ARS MEDICA. 2016 [acceso: 29/06/2022]; 41(3):8-15. Disponible en: https://173.236.243.65/index.php/MED/article/view/56
34. Smit M, Koopman B, Dieperink W, Hulscher JBF, Hofker HS, van Meurs M, et al. Intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome in patients admitted to the ICU. Annals of Intensive Care. 2020; 10(1):[aprox 1p.]. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-020-00746-9
35. Soler C, Lombardo TA, Tamargo TO, de Almeida AS, Mezquia N, Noriega Y. Aplicación de un sistema pronóstico de reoperación en el posoperatorio de cirugía abdominal de urgencia. Rev Cuba Med Int Emerg. 2019 [acceso: 29/06/2022]; 18(4):[aprox. 1 p.]. Disponible en: http://www.revmie.sld.cu/index.php/mie/article/view/670
36. Soler C, Tamargo TO, Pérez JC, Lombardo TA, Illodo OL. Validez de tres procedimientos para la predicción de reoperación en cirugía abdominal: estudio de cohorte. Rev Cub de Med Milit. 2020 [acceso: 29/06/2022]; 49(4):[aprox 1p]. Disponible en: http://www.revmedmilitar.sld.cu/index.php/mil/article/view/760
37. Lombardo Vaillant TA, Tamargo Barbeito TO, Noriega Amado Y. Sistema de Ayuda para el Pronóstico de Reintervención en Cirugía Abdominal (SAPRCA). La Habana: Hospital Clínico Quirúrgico Hermanos Ameijeiras; 2017.
38. Soler C, Lombardo TA, Tamargo TO, Sagué A. Sistema de Ayuda para el Pronóstico de Reintervención en Cirugía Abdominal (SAPRCA). La Habana: Hospital Hermanos Ameijeiras; 2020.
2. Van Ruler O, Boermeester MA. Surgical treatment of secondary peritonitis. Der Chirurg. 2017; 88(Suppl 1):[aprox 5p.]. DOI: 10.1007/s00104-015-0121-x
3. Sartelli M, Catena F, Abu-Zidan FM, Ansaloni L, Biffl WL, Boermeester MA, et al. Management of intra-abdominal infections: recommendations by the WSES 2016 consensus conference. World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2017 [acceso: 29/06/2022]; 12(1):[aprox 22 p.]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-017-0132-7
4. García-Gómez JM, Tortajada S, Sáez C. Sistemas de Ayuda a la Decisión Médica. Valencia: Editorial Universidad Politécnica de Valencia; 2019 [acceso: 29/06/2022]. Disponible en: https://riunet.upv.es/bitstream/handle/10251/123418/Garc%C3%ADa%3BS-%C3%A1ez%3BTortajada%20-%20Sistemas%20de%20ayuda%20a%20la%20decisi%C3%B3n%20m%C3-%A9dica.pdf?sequence=1
5. Schorr C, Towsend SR. Chapter 67. Performance Improvement and Severity Scores En: Parrillo J, Dellinger P, editores. Critical Care Medicine: Principles of diagnosis and management in the adults, Section 8: Administrative, Ethical, and Psychological Issues in the Care of the Critically Ill. 5th ed. Elsevier; 2018 [acceso: 29/06/2022]. 1127-37.e4 p. Disponible en: https://www.elsevier.com/books/critical-care-medicine/parrillo/978-0-323-44676-1
6. Peña AE, Chang A. Capítulo 3. Sistemas de valoración pronóstica en Medicina Intensiva. En: Caballero A, editor. Terapia Intensiva I. 3ra Ed. La Habana: ECIMED; 2020. p 51-122.
7. Tolonen M, Coccolini F, Ansaloni L, Sartelli M, Roberts DJ, McKee JL, et al. Getting the invite list right: a discussion of sepsis severity scoring systems in severe complicated intra-abdominal sepsis and randomized trial inclusion criteria. World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2018 [acceso: 29/06/2022]; 13:[aprox 1p.]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13017-018-0177-2
8. Rausei S, Pappalardo V, Ruspi L, Colella A, Giudici S, Ardita V, et al. Early Versus Delayed Source Control in Open Abdomen Management for Severe Intra-abdominal Infections: A Retrospective Analysis on 111 Cases. World Journal of Surgery. 2018 [acceso: 29/06/2022]; 42(3):[aprox 5 p.]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-4233-y
9. Rodríguez Fernández Z, Fernández López O, Maren GO, Romero García LI. Algunas consideraciones sobre las infecciones posoperatorias. Revista Cubana de Cirugía. 2017 [acceso: 29/06/2022]; 56:46-58. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-74932017000200005&nrm=iso
10. Altemeier WA, Burke JF, Pruitt BAJr., Sandusky WR. Manual on control of infection in surgical patients. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PAJB: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1984.
11. Otero CH. Factores de riesgo de infección del sitio quirúrgico. Revista Venezolana de Cirugía. 2017 [acceso: 29/06/2022]; 70(1):[aprox 3p.]. Disponible en: https://www.revistavenezolanadecirugia.com/index.php/revista/article/view/28
12. World Health Organization. Important Issues in the Approach to Surgical Site Infection Prevention. Geneve: Global Guidelines for the Prevention of Surgical Site Infection; 2018. [acceso: 29/06/2022]. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/infection-prevention/tools/surgical/SSI-surveillance-protocol.pdf
13. Kirkpatrick AW, Coccolini F, Ansaloni L, Roberts DJ, Tolonen M, McKee JL, et al. Closed Or Open after Source Control Laparotomy for Severe Complicated Intra-Abdominal Sepsis (the COOL trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. World Journal of Emergency Surgery. 2018; 13(1):[aprox 1p.]. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-018-0183-4
14. Knaus WA, Zimmerman JC, Wagner DP, Draper EA, Lawrence DE. APACHE acute physiology and chronic health evaluation a physiologically based classification system. Crit Care Med. 1981; 9:[aprox 6p.]. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-198108000-00008
15. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonça A, Bruining H, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. Intensive Care Medicine. 1996; 22(7):[aprox 4p.]. DOI: 10.1007/BF01709751
16. Vincent JL, Moreno R. Clinical review: Scoring systems in the critically ill. Critical Care. 2010 [acceso: 29/06/2022]; 14(2):[aprox 1p.]. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1186/cc8204
17. Reintam A, Malbrain ML, Starkopf J, Fruhwald S, Jakob SM, De Waele J, et al. Gastrointestinal function in intensive care patients: terminology, definitions and management. Recommendations of the ESICM Working Group on Abdominal Problems. Intensive Care Med. 2012; 38:[aprox 10 p.]. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-011-2459-y
18. Elebute EA, Stoner HB. The grading of sepsis. Br J Surg. 1983; 70:29-31. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800700111
19. Dominioni L, Dionigi R. The grading of sepsis and the assessment of its prognosis in the surgical patient: a review. Surg Res Comm. 1987 [acceso: 26/07/2022]; 1:1-11. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306198091_The_grading_of_-sepsis_and_the_assessment_of_its_prognosis_in_the_surgical_patient_A_review
20. Teichmann W, Whittmann DH, Andreone PA. Scheduled reoperations (ettapenlavage) for diffuse peritonitis Arch Surg. 1986; 121: [aprox 5p.]. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1986.01400020033002
21. Wacha HLM, Feldman U. Mannheim Peritonitis Index: Prediction of risk of death from peritonitis. Construction of a statistical and validation of an empirically based index. Theoret Surg. 1987; 1:169-77. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3568820/
22. Scapellato S, Parrinelo V, Sciuto GS, Castorina G, Buffone A, Cirino E. Valuation on prognostic factors about secondary acute peritonitis: review of 255 cases. Ann Ital Chir. 2004 [acceso: 29/06/2022]; 75(2):[aprox 4p]. Disponible en: http://europepmc.org/article/MED/15386997
23. Ranson JH. Diagnostic standards for acute Pancreatitis. World J Surg. 1997; 21:[aprox 6p.]. DOI: 10.1007/s002689900205
24. Biondo S, Ramos E, Fraccalvieri D, Kreisler E, Marti J, Jaurrieta E. Comparative study of left colonic Peritonitis Severity Score and Mannheim Peritonitis Index. Br J Surg. 2006; 93:[aprox 6p.]. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.5326
25. Thorsen K, Søreide JA, Søreide K. Scoring systems for outcome prediction in patients with perforated peptic ulcer. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. 2013 [acceso: 29/06/2022]; 21:25. Disponible en: http://www.sjtrem.com/content/21/1/25
26. Copeland GP. The POSSUM System of Surgical Audit. Archives of Surgery. 2002 [acceso: 29/6/2022]; 137(1):15-9. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.137.1.15
27. Pusajó JFBE, Doglio G, Cherjovsky MR, Lipinszki AI, Hernández MS, Egurrola MA. Postoperative intra-abdominal sepsis requiring reoperation. Arch Surg. 1993 [acceso: 29/06/2022]; 128:[aprox 5p.]. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/14768433
28. van Ruler O, Kiewiet JJ, Boer KR, Lamme B, Gouma DJ, Boermeester MA, et al. Failure of available scoring systems to predict ongoing infection in patients with abdominal sepsis after their initial emergency laparotomy. BMC surgery. 2011;11:[aprox 1p.]. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2482-11-38
29. Lombardo Vaillant TA, Soler Morejón C, Lombardo Vaillan J, Casamayor Laime Z. Aplicación del índice predictivo de reintervención abdominal en el diagnóstico de complicaciones infecciosas intraabdominales. Rev Cub Med Mil. 2009 [acceso: 29/06/2022]; 38(1):[aprox 9p.]. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0138-65572009000100002&lng=es
30. Kamil RF, Lalisang TJ, Kekalih A. Merit of APACHE II, MPI and ARPI scores as determinants On Demand Relaparotomy. The New Ropanasuri Journal of Surgery. 2016 [acceso: 29/06/2022]; 1(1):[aprox 8p.]. Disponible en: https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/nrjs/vol1/iss1/5
31. González Aguilera JC. Índices y factores pronóstico en pacientes con peritonitis difusas secundarias [Tesis Doctoral]. Granma, Bayamo: Universidad de Granma; 2004. Disponible en: http://tesis.sld.cu/index.php?P=FullRecord&ID=30
32. Cervantes Betancourt JR. Nuevo índice predictivo para relaparotomías [Tesis Doctoral]. Santa Clara, Villa Clara: Universidad de Ciencias Médicas; 2008. Disponible en: http://tesis.sld.cu/index.php?P=FullRecord&ID=516
33. Soler-Morejón CD, Tamargo-Barbeito TO, Malbrain M. Modelo de pronóstico de reoperación en cirugía abdominal. ARS MEDICA. 2016 [acceso: 29/06/2022]; 41(3):8-15. Disponible en: https://173.236.243.65/index.php/MED/article/view/56
34. Smit M, Koopman B, Dieperink W, Hulscher JBF, Hofker HS, van Meurs M, et al. Intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome in patients admitted to the ICU. Annals of Intensive Care. 2020; 10(1):[aprox 1p.]. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-020-00746-9
35. Soler C, Lombardo TA, Tamargo TO, de Almeida AS, Mezquia N, Noriega Y. Aplicación de un sistema pronóstico de reoperación en el posoperatorio de cirugía abdominal de urgencia. Rev Cuba Med Int Emerg. 2019 [acceso: 29/06/2022]; 18(4):[aprox. 1 p.]. Disponible en: http://www.revmie.sld.cu/index.php/mie/article/view/670
36. Soler C, Tamargo TO, Pérez JC, Lombardo TA, Illodo OL. Validez de tres procedimientos para la predicción de reoperación en cirugía abdominal: estudio de cohorte. Rev Cub de Med Milit. 2020 [acceso: 29/06/2022]; 49(4):[aprox 1p]. Disponible en: http://www.revmedmilitar.sld.cu/index.php/mil/article/view/760
37. Lombardo Vaillant TA, Tamargo Barbeito TO, Noriega Amado Y. Sistema de Ayuda para el Pronóstico de Reintervención en Cirugía Abdominal (SAPRCA). La Habana: Hospital Clínico Quirúrgico Hermanos Ameijeiras; 2017.
38. Soler C, Lombardo TA, Tamargo TO, Sagué A. Sistema de Ayuda para el Pronóstico de Reintervención en Cirugía Abdominal (SAPRCA). La Habana: Hospital Hermanos Ameijeiras; 2020.
Published
2023-01-01
How to Cite
1.
Soler Morejón C de D, Cordero escobar MI, Tamargo Barbeito TO, Lombardo Vaillant TA. Support systems for abdominal reoperation prognosis. Rev Cubana Med Milit [Internet]. 2023 Jan. 1 [cited 2025 May 17];52(1):e02302213. Available from: https://revmedmilitar.sld.cu/index.php/mil/article/view/2213
Issue
Section
Opinion Article
License
Authors who have publications with this Journal accept the following terms:
- The authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the Journal the right of first publication of their work, which will simultaneously be subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License. The content presented here can be shared, copied and redistributed in any medium or format; Can be adapted, remixed, transformed or created from the material, using the following terms: Attribution (giving appropriate credit to the work, providing a link to the license, and indicating if changes have been made); non-commercial (you cannot use the material for commercial purposes) and share-alike (if you remix, transform or create new material from this work, you can distribute your contribution as long as you use the same license as the original work).
- The authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the published version of the work (for example: depositing it in an institutional electronic archive or publishing it in a monographic volume) as long as the initial publication in this Journal is indicated.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional electronic archives or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase citations. of the published work.
