Colonoscopy with the water immersion method in colorectal cancer screening

Authors

Keywords:

colonoscopy with the water method, adenomas, colorectal cancer.

Abstract

Introduction: Colonoscopy is useful for the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal diseases. It is used as a method of detecting malignant diseases. Most cases of colorectal cancer originate from an adenoma, a process known as the adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Removal of advanced adenomas interrupts the potential pathway for colorectal cancer development. The water method of colonoscopy increases the detection rate of adenomas.
Objective: To update knowledge related to colonoscopy with the method of immersion in water.
Development: Water-assisted colonoscopy can be subdivided into water immersion, water exchange, or totally underwater. Both immersion and water exchange colonoscopy produce less pain for the patient and reduce the need for sedation medications, with a higher percentage of colonoscopies completed in awake patients. The use of water improves the detection of adenomas by facilitating greater cleaning of the intestine of residual feces, in addition to allowing inspection of the mucosa without completely distending the light as air does, increasing the detection performance of flat lesions.
Conclusions: The detection rate of adenomas with the water method, especially at the level of the right colon, is higher than with the air insufflation method.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Yunia Tusen Toledo, Centro de Investigaciones Clínicas

Jefa Departamento Gastroenterología Centro de Investigaciones Clínicas
Especialista 2do Grado Gastroenterología
Máster en Urgencias Médicas
Profesor asistente.
Investigador Agregado

Lissette Chao González, CIMEQ

Dra.C
Jefa del Departamento Gastroenterología CIMEQ
Profesor Titular
Investigador Titular
Máster en Urgencias Médicas
Secretaria Sociedad Cubana Gastroenterología

Lisset Barroso Márquez, CIMEQ

Especialista 2do Grado Gastroenterología
Profesor Auxiliar
Investigador Agregado


Ludmila Martínez Leyva, HMC Dr. Carlos J. Finlay

Dra. C.

Especialista de II grado en Gastroenterología

Máster en procederes diagnósticos en atención primaria de salud. Máster en Cirugía de Mínimo Acceso

Profesor Titular

Investigador Auxiliar

Jefe del Servicio de Gastroenterología del HMC Dr. Carlos J. Finlay

Teresita Pérez González, Hospital General Docente Iván Portuondo. Artemisa

Especialista 1er Grado MGI y Gastroenterología 

Harlim Rodríguez Rodríguez, Hospital General Docente Iván Portuondo. Artemisa

Especialista 1er Grado en MGI y Gastroenterología



References

1. Smith RA, Andrews KS, Brooks D, Fedewa SA, Manassaram-Baptiste D, Saslow D, et al. Cancer screening in the United States, 2019: A review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019; 69(3):184-210. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21557

2. Montes de Oca Megías E, Noa Pedroso G, García Jordá E, Seijas Cabrera O, Pérez Triana F, Brizuela Quintanilla R. La colonoscopia como prueba de oro para la pesquisa del cáncer colorrectal. Rev Cubana Med. 2013 [acceso: 27/07/2022]; 52(1): 60-71. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-75232013000100007&lng=es

3. Domínguez L, Chávez MA, Manrique MA, Tapia M, Méndez DV, Velásquez O, et al. Seguridad y eficacia de la colonoscopia en el adulto mayor en la unidad de Endoscopia del Hospital Juárez de México. Endoscopía. 2020 [acceso: 17/10/2022]; 32(2):135-40. Disponible en: https://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/endo/v32s2/0188-9893-endo-32-supl2-135.pdf

4. Alfaro AA, Manrique A, Chávez MA, Cerna J. Colonoscopia de intercambio mínimo de agua y su impacto en el índice de detección de pólipos: estudio aleatorizado. Endoscopia. 2019 [acceso: 17/10/2022]; 31(2):260-6. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2444-64832019000600260&lng=es

5. Santodomingo C, Zuramay C. Eficacia de la colonoscopia con la técnica de inmersión de agua comparada con la técnica de colonoscopia convencional. Endoscopia. 2016; 26(2):43-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.endomx.2013.10.002

6. Leung FW. Methods of reducing discomfort during colonoscopy. Digestive diseases and sciences. 2008; 53(6):1462-7. DOI: 10.1007/s10620-007-0025-9

7. Jia H, Pan Y, Guo X, Zhao L, Wang X, Zhang L, et al. Water Exchange Method Significantly Improves Adenoma Detection Rate: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial. American Journal of Gastroenterology. 2017; 112(4):568-76. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2016.501

8. Hsieh Y, Tseng C, Hu C, Koo M, Leung FW. Prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing adenoma detection rate in colonoscopy using water exchange, water immersion, and air insufflations. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2017; 86(1):192-201. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.12.005

9. Asai S, Fujimoto N, Tanoue K, Nakao E, Hashimoto K, Ichinona T, et al. Water immersion colonoscopy facilitates straight passage of the colonoscope through the sigmoid colon without loop formation: randomized controlled trial. Dig Endosc. 2015; 27(3):345-53. DOI: 10.1111/den.12406

10. Azevedo R, Leitão C, Pinto J, Ribeiro H, Pereira F, Caldeira A, et al. Can water exchange improve patient tolerance in unsedated colonoscopy a prospective comparative study.GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2018; 25(4):166-74. DOI: 10.1159/000484093

11. Hafner S, Zolk K, Radaelli F, Otte J, Rabenstein T, Zolk O. Water infusion versus air insufflations for colonoscopy. Cochrane Database Systemic Reviews. 2015; 26(5):CD009863. DOI: 10.1002/14651858

12. Rodríguez-Fernández Z, de-Wayne-Brown M, Cisneros-Domínguez C, Romero-García L, Ricardo-Ramírez J. Especificidades clínico-epidemiológicas y diagnósticas del cáncer de colon con metástasis hepáticas sincrónicas. Revista Cubana de Cirugía. 2021 [acceso: 27/07/2022]; 60(1):1-17 Disponible en: http://www.revcirugia.sld.cu/index.php/cir/article/view/1020

13. Maple JT, Banerjee S, Barth BA, Bhat YM, Desilets DJ, Gottlieb KT, et al. Methods of luminal distention for colonoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2013; 77(4):519-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.09.025

14. Abdelbary M, Hamdy S, Shehab H, E Garhy N, Menesy M, Marzaban R. Técnicas colonoscópicas para la detección de pólipos: un estudio egipcio. Revista de Gastroenterología de México . 2021 [acceso: 27/07/2022]; 86(1):36-43. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375090620300768

15. Kaminski MF, Thomas-Gibson S, Bugajski M, Bretthauer M, Rees CJ, Dekker E, et al. Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Quality Improvement Initiative. Endoscopy. 2017; 49(4):378-397. DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-103411

16. Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, Pike IM, Adler DG, Fennerty MB, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2015; 81(1):31-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.058

17. Segal JP, Kanagasundaram C, Mills P, Bassett P, Greenfield SM. Polyp detection rate: does length matter? Frontline Gastroenterol. 2019; 10(2):107-12. DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2017-100945

18. Anderson JC. Use of Total Under Water Colonoscopy to Navigate Endoscopic Challenges. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2020; 18(7):1427-1430. DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2020.02.042

19. Catinean A, Neag MA, Tulbure M. The advantages of water immersion colonoscopy in ambulatory service. Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology. 2019; 30(7):636-40. DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2019.18784

20. Leung FW, Leung JW, Siao-Salera RM, Mann SK, Jackson G. The water method significantly enhances detection of diminutive lesions (adenoma and hyperplastic polyp combined) in the proximal colon in screening colonoscopy - data derived from two RCT in US veterans. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2011; 1(2):48-52. DOI: 10.4161/jig.1.2.16826

21. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68(6):394-424. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21492

22. Vanegas Morenoa DP, Ramírez López LX, Limas Solanoc LM,Pedraza Bernal AM, Monroy Díaz AL. Factores asociados a cáncer colorrectal. Rev. Méd. Risaralda. 2020; 26(1):68-77. DOI 10.22517/25395203.23111

23. Utrera-Díaz G, Pérez-Rodríguez L, Toledo-Yanes P. Cáncer colorrectal: Factores de riesgo en pacientes mayores de 50años en Cienfuegos. Revista Finlay. 2021 [acceso: 27/07/2022]; 11(3):[aprox. 6 p.]. Disponible en: http://www.revfinlay.sld.cu/index.php/finlay/article/view/920

24. Ministerio de Salud Pública. Anuario estadístico de salud 2019. La Habana: Dirección de registros médicos y estadísticas de salud; 2020. Disponible en: https://files.sld.cu/bvscuba/files/2020/05/Anuario-Electrónico-Español-2019-ed-2020.pdf

25. Hernández García A. Análisis de los factores pronósticos en el cáncer de colon estadios II y III [Tesis Doctoral]. Zaragoza: Universidad de Zaragoza; 2018 [acceso: 27/07/2022]. Disponible en: https://zaguan.unizar.es/record/79653/files/TESIS-2019-130.pdf

26. Burgos H. Estándares de calidad en videocolonoscopía. Acta Gastroenterol Latinoam 2020 [acceso: 17/10/2022]; 50(4):25-31. Disponible en: https://actagastro.org/estandares-de-calidad-en-videocolonoscopia/

27. Calderón Reza JC. Cáncer de colon, secuencia adenoma carcinoma y pólipo aserrado. 2018 [acceso: 27/07/2022]; 14(62):52-55. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1990-86442018000200008&lng=es&tlng=es

28. Rex DK, Boland CR, Dominitz JA, Giardiello FM, Johnson DA, Kaltenbach T, et al. Colorectal Cancer Screening: Recommendations for Physicians and Patients From the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. American Journal of Gastroenterology, 2017; 112(7):1016-30. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2017.174

29. Shaukat A, Rector TS, Church TR, Lederle FA, Kim AS, Rank JM, et al. Longer Withdrawal Time Is Associated with a Reduced Incidence of Interval Cancer After Screening Colonoscopy. Gastroenterology. 2015; 149(4):952-7. DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2015.06.044

30. Shaw AT, Engelman JA. Adenoma Detection Rate and Risk of Colorectal Cancer and. N Engl J Med. 2014; 370(26):2537-9. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1309086

31. Chen Z, Li Z, Yu X, Wang G. Is water exchange superior to water immersion for colonoscopy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Saudi J Gastroenterol. 2018; 24(5):259-67. DOI: 10.4103/sjg.SJG_52_18

32. Anderson JC, Kahi CJ, Sullivan A, MacPhail M, Garcia J, Rex DK. Comparing adenoma and polyp miss rates for total under water colonoscopy versus standard CO2: a randomized controlled trial using a tandem colonoscopy approach. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2019; 89(3):591-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.09.046

33. Siau K, Beintaris I. My approach to water-assisted colonoscopy. Frontline Gastroenterology. 2019; 10(2):194-7. DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2018-101143

34. Leung FW, Jia H. Expert endorsement, a prerequisite to general acceptance, marked a significant milestone in the history of water exchange colonoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 2018; 88(4):598-600. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2018.08.001

Published

2023-03-01

How to Cite

1.
Tusen Toledo Y, Chao González L, Barroso Márquez L, Martínez Leyva L, Pérez González T, Rodríguez Rodríguez H. Colonoscopy with the water immersion method in colorectal cancer screening. Rev Cubana Med Milit [Internet]. 2023 Mar. 1 [cited 2025 Mar. 14];52(2):e02302330. Available from: https://revmedmilitar.sld.cu/index.php/mil/article/view/2330

Issue

Section

Review Article