The invaluable work of the reviewers of Revista Cubana de Medicina Militar
Keywords:
review, peer review, military medicineAbstract
The invaluable work of the reviewers of Revista Cubana de Medicina MilitarDownloads
References
2. Smith R. Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals [Internet]. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine. 2006. 99(4):178-82. DOI: 10.1177/014107680609900414
3. Song E, Ang L, Park JY, Jun EY, Kim KH, Jun J, et al. A scoping review on biomedical journal peer review guides for reviewers [Internet]. PlosOne. 2021; 16(5): e0251440. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251440
4. Mavrogenis AF, Quaile A, Scarlat MM. The good, the bad and the rude peer-review [Internet]. International Orthopaedics (SICOT). 2020; 44: 413-15. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-020-04504-1
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who have publications with this Journal accept the following terms:
- The authors will retain their copyright and guarantee the Journal the right of first publication of their work, which will simultaneously be subject to the Creative Commons Attribution License. The content presented here can be shared, copied and redistributed in any medium or format; Can be adapted, remixed, transformed or created from the material, using the following terms: Attribution (giving appropriate credit to the work, providing a link to the license, and indicating if changes have been made); non-commercial (you cannot use the material for commercial purposes) and share-alike (if you remix, transform or create new material from this work, you can distribute your contribution as long as you use the same license as the original work).
- The authors may adopt other non-exclusive license agreements for the distribution of the published version of the work (for example: depositing it in an institutional electronic archive or publishing it in a monographic volume) as long as the initial publication in this Journal is indicated.
- Authors are allowed and recommended to disseminate their work through the Internet (e.g., in institutional electronic archives or on their website) before and during the submission process, which can produce interesting exchanges and increase citations. of the published work.